The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation" — John Shaqi
The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation"Figgis, Darrell
History
The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation"
Figgis, Darrell
Ireland -- Politics and government; Irish question
Had Brian lived, or had he been able to establish his dynasty, the
result would, without doubt, have been achieved. Unfortunately he fell
in the hour of his triumph, at the battle of Clontarf. He had broken
the O’Neill succession; and the elder branch of that dynasty were the
O’Conors of Connacht. Therefore for a century a triangular dynastic
dispute arose between the O’Briens, the O’Neills, and the O’Conors.
III. THE POLITY AND THE STATE.
The polity that thus emerged consisted of a number of stateships
throughout the country, each of which was a smaller reproduction of the
State in which it was comprised, and each of which was a unit in the
organisation of that State. Because it was a system that was competent
to continue itself independently of a central authority its natural
tendency was to dispense with that central authority; yet the device
was such that authority, once established, was distributed from the
centre down to all the branches, and was gathered from the branches up
towards the centre, in a well-concerted scheme. And this proved to be
the case even when the monarch was weak, independently of his personal
power.
A good deal of confusion has been introduced into the understanding
of old history by the way in which its records were written. Europe
at that time was full of wars; and Ireland was no exception. To
chroniclers in a day when personal prowess counted for much it was more
important to record a battle in which some famous man fell than to
record the continuous social life of a community. The result is that in
the records the battles seem to obliterate the social life, and plunge
it into chaos. To the modern mind particularly it seems so, for the
modern man knows nothing of wars save as great continental cataclysms,
in which whole nations are hurled against whole nations, and all life
is brought to a standstill, while death claims its daily thousands, and
chivalry is displaced by venom and hatred. The modern mind must not
judge of ancient days by the world’s decay. The “battles,” that the
belittlers of Ireland are so eager to emphasise, as little suspended
the general life of the country, seldom employed a larger hosting of
men on each side, and even used few weapons more destructive, than the
faction fights of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. We know,
for instance, that the eleventh century, when Ireland was involved in
a triangular dynastic dispute and more full of wars than at any other
time, is famous for its literary activity. Historians were busy, old
tales were re-written, and great books were compiled. All this, we are
told, came from a soil across which wars were surging; but the result
clearly shows that these wars did not suspend, or even greatly impede,
the artistic, social and economic life of the Nation. It is necessary
to see this, and to get a right perspective, in perceiving the life of
the nation in the polity it achieved.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account