The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation"Figgis, Darrell
History
The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation"
Figgis, Darrell
Ireland -- Politics and government; Irish question
Nor could any man sell the usage of any land to anyone not in his own
stateship without permission. Within his own stateship he could do so
by obtaining permission from his own family. If he died his land was
resumed by the family--a process that was known as _gabhal-cine_, “the
seizure of the family,” in English corrupted to gavelkind--whereupon a
redistribution would occur. From which it would seem that the grants
were not made to individuals, but to the heads of families, the kindred
being a unit within the stateship as the stateship was a unit within
the State. But the right of the individual to the use of land none
could withhold; it was his title as a freeman, and was implanted in the
heritage of his thoughts and instincts.
Land, and its free possession by the people, were thus the foundation
on which the whole structure of the State was built. Power always
derived thence and always returned thither again, as surely as water
must find its own level.
The divisions of rank among the freemen were mainly ranks of
responsibility, with corresponding privileges attached to each rank.
The Nobles, for instance, were clearly executive officers of the
stateship. They held land from which they could not be dispossessed in
any re-distribution that might be necessary. That is to say, they could
not be dispossessed of land until they were first dispossessed of their
rank, and that would first involve a legal action; but on the other
hand they were responsible for the use of that land to the stateship,
and could not sell or hire that use to any member of another stateship
without permission.
The two chief executive officers were the King of the stateship and
(to employ a word that is not so modern as it appears) the mayors
of townships. The King was elected by all the freemen in assembly,
but their choice was limited to selection from a kingly household,
the _righ-damhna_. He had, sitting in court, the power of capital
punishment, with the approval of his brehons and the assent of the
people. This, it seems, was a power seldom exercised, for the ordinary
operation of the law went otherwise; but the Annals record instances of
its use. He led the stateship in war when a hosting was demanded; and
as, in the festivals at Tara, he met in assembly with the Kings of all
the other stateships, it would seem that some code existed among them
in order to bring the practice of their office into general uniformity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account