The Gentle Shepherd: A Pastoral ComedyRamsay, Allan
General
The Gentle Shepherd: A Pastoral Comedy
Ramsay, Allan
Scottish drama -- 18th century
[Footnote 39: I am convinced, however, from a comparison of many of
Ramsay's interpretations, both in the Glossary to the _Evergreen_,
printed in 1724, and in that, which is subjoined to his _Poems_, with
the interpretations given by Ruddiman in the Glossary to _G. Douglas's
Virgil_, that Ramsay had made frequent use of the latter for the
explanation of the most antiquated words; though he does not seem to
have studied it with that care, which his duty as an editor of ancient
Scotish poetry certainly required. In proof of this, his obligations
to Ruddiman's Glossary, the reader has only to compare, with the
interpretations in that work, the following, given by Ramsay in the
Glossary to his Poems: _Bodin_, _Brankan_, _Camschough_, _Dern_,
_Douks_, _Dynles_, _Elritch_, _Ettle_, _Freck_, _Gousty_, _Moup_,
_Pawky_, _Withershins_; and the following, in the Glossary to the
Evergreen: _Crawdon_, _Galziart_, _Ithandly_, _Ourefret_, _Ruse_,
_Schent_, &c.]
From these considerations, one cannot but wonder at the observation,
which is sometimes made even by Scotsmen of good taste, that the
language of _The Gentle Shepherd_ disgusts from its vulgarity. It is
true, that in the present day, the Scotish dialect is heard only in
the mouths of the lowest of the populace, in whom it is generally
associated with vulgarity of sentiment; but those critics should
recollect, that it was the language of the Scotish people, which was
to be imitated, and that too of the people upwards of a century ago,
if we carry our mind back to the epoch of the scene.
If _Ramsay_ had made the shepherds of the Lowlands of Scotland, in the
middle of the seventeenth century, speak correct English, how
preposterous would have been such a composition! But, with perfect
propriety, he gave them the language which belonged to them; and if
the sentiments of the speakers be not reproachable with unnecessary
vulgarity, we cannot with justice associate vulgarism with a dialect,
which in itself is proper, and in its application is characteristic.
After all, what is the language of Ramsay, but the common speech of
Yorkshire during the last century?[40]
[Footnote 40: See "A Yorkshire Dialogue in its pure natural dialect;"
printed at York, 1684.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account