The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western EuropeWright, John Kirtland
History
The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western Europe
Wright, John Kirtland
Geography -- History; Geography, Medieval
The Greeks and Romans certainly had no satisfactory understanding of the
general circulation of the atmosphere. Only with the maritime voyages
since the fifteenth century have we come to know the distribution of
belts of prevailing winds and calms. Aristotle said that the etesian, or
north, winds blow from the cold countries full of water and snow under
the Great Bear; and that the south wind originates at, but not south of,
the Tropic of Cancer;[90] this is the nearest he came to giving a theory
of atmospheric circulation. Megasthenes had heard of the monsoons of the
Indian Ocean; Pliny described the use made of them by sailors in going
out to India,[91] but he made no attempt to explain the general areas of
westerlies or trades. On the other hand, Aristotle,[92] Seneca,[93] and
Pliny[94] all recognized and discussed at considerable length the
influences of wind on weather; for example, the fact that the etesians,
though they bring clear skies to Italy, deluge Ethiopia and India with
rain—a conception which contains a shadow of truth.[95] Auster, the
south wind, was supposed to bring rain to Italy.
THE WATER ELEMENT
Since water was one of the four—or, according to Aristotle,
five—elements that were supposed to make up the universe, the ancient
authorities looked upon the ocean as necessarily as old as the earth
itself. Seneca thought that the Nile and the Ister (Danube) are of equal
age with the primordial ocean, because of remarkable characteristics
which differentiate them from all other streams.[96]
THE SEA: ITS SALINITY, DEPTH, CURRENTS, AND TIDES
We must note what features of the sea interested the Greeks and Romans.
These were primarily its saltness, its depth, its currents, and its
tides.
The problem of why the sea is salt gave rise to a good deal of
theorizing. That the evaporation of the lighter fresh water leaves
behind the heavy salt water was well understood, but in the further
solution of the problem opinions diverged widely. Aristotle thought that
the salt was the result of combustion;[97] that it was an ashlike
substance first carried into the air by the exhalations from the earth
and then deposited in the sea by rainfall—particularly by the autumn
rains that accompany the south winds blowing from hot, dry districts
where the process of combustion is most active. Pliny believed that the
salt came partly from dry vapors intermingled with the sea waters and
partly from the nature of the earth, which tends to impregnate the sea
with salt.[98]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account