Elisa was finally divorced from Luetzow. Immermann was appointed a judge in Magdeburg, and later in Duesseldorf. He asked Elisa to marry him. She refused, but offered to live with him in free companionship. They joined their lives, pledging themselves not to enter other relations. They remained together until 1839, less than a year before Immermann's death, when he married a young girl of nineteen. Elisa left his house in sorrow and bitterness. Immermann characterized his relation to her thus in a letter to his fiancée, in 1839: "I loved the countess deeply and purely when I was kindled by her flame. But she took such a strange position toward me that I never could have a pure, genuine, enduring joy in this love. There were delights, but no quiet gladness. I always felt as if a splendid comet had appeared on the horizon, but never as if the dear warm God's sun had risen." His life with Elisa in Duesseldorf was rich in friends and works. The sculptor Schadow, the founder of the art school there, the dramatists von Uechtritz and Michael Beer, brother of Meyerbeer, were among his friends. He had intimate relations with Mendelssohn during the years of the latter's stay in Duesseldorf. He tried to assist Grabbe, the erratic and unfortunate dramatist. During three years he was manager of the Duesseldorf theatre, trying many valuable and idealistic experiments. He died August 25, 1840. The most important of his works are _Das Trauerspiel in Tirol_, 1826, treating of the tragic story of Andreas Hofer; _Kaiser Friedrich II_., 1827, a drama of the Hohenstaufen; the comic heroic epic, _Tulifaentchen_, 1830, a satiric version of an heroic Tom Thumb; _Alexis_, 1832, a trilogy setting forth the destruction of the reforms begun by Peter the Great; _Merlin_, 1832; and his two novels, _Die Epigonen_, 1836, and _Münchhausen_, 1838-9. In _Die Epigonen_, one of the long list of representatives of the species of novels which began with Goethe's _Wilhelm Meister_, Immermann tried to present the development of a young man and a picture of the principal social forces of his period. But he was too imitative in following his great model, and too much confused by subjective preoccupations, to comprehend and to state clearly the substance of the matter.