World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations -- Submarine
The Swedish steamer _Snetoppen_ was bound for New York on the 4th
July, 1917, when a submarine came to the surface on her starboard bow
and commenced to shell her. After half-a-dozen shots had been fired
the master decided that his position was hopeless, and gave orders to
abandon ship in two boats.
The Germans then proceeded to loot the steamer, taking the ship's
chronometer and barometer, two sextants, and three boat-loads of
provisions. The German sailors ransacked the state-rooms, while their
officers demanded whiskey, beer, and cognac, besides taking all the
clothes they could lay hands on. They sank the steamer with bombs, and
left the survivors in their boats. These were afterwards picked up by
an American destroyer.
With regard to these cases, it would probably be contended by the
Germans that the sufferings of the _Dauntless'_ survivors were
unavoidable. But what about the shelling of the vessel? This was
wholly unnecessary, and resulted in the death of one man. The Germans
could have committed their thefts of provisions, turpentine and enamel
without first shelling the ship. To the lesser crime of theft they
need not have added the greater crime of murder.
In the same way, the shelling of the British trawlers was totally
uncalled for; and since it is not to be supposed that the German fires
merely for the amusement of discharging his guns, another conclusion
is forced upon us. It will be noticed that shots were fired while the
boats were being lowered in the cases of the _Dauntless_, _Benbow_, and
_Ireland_. With what object, except to take life? Upon the occasions
under review the German missed his mark; but this does not always
happen, as the study of other cases will show.
Apart from the firing, the examples quoted show the German as thief,
although in the sinking of the _Invercauld_ the pirates defeated their
own ends, so far as food was concerned. The giving of a receipt for the
articles taken was in accordance with the German Prize Regulations,
which lay down that: "H.M. ships can, in case of need, replenish from
the cargo and from the non-consumable and consumable stores of captured
enemy ships (a receipt being given for anything taken) if the articles
are not proved beyond doubt to be neutral."
The incidents connected with the sinking of the _Alfred_ make one
speculate as to the standard by which German naval officers regulate
their conduct. It is inconceivable that any British commander would
allow his men to laugh and sneer at a number of hapless seamen
struggling in the water. This German officer, however, did not hesitate
to do so.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account