The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1009, April 29, 1899Various
General
The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1009, April 29, 1899
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals
There are no girls more engaging than those who are trying to do or
to be something of value, and having said that, our opinion may be
inferred of the numerous company who have worked so diligently during
the three months of this interesting competition. It has been an affair
of “long breath,” and has proved this, if it has proved anything, that
our girls are of the right sort.
That it has been enjoyed is clear from many letters received from
competitors. “It has taken up a good deal of time,” writes one girl,
“but the time has been well spent, because the questions asked were of
real value, and to be able to answer at least the greater number of
them, might be regarded as a general test of our being well informed.”
The competition was chiefly a lesson in the art of hunting up
information, an art always of service. The questions were not to be
replied to by guess-work, or by the exercise of a ready imagination. In
the preparation of their papers, girls learned how to make good use of
books of reference, and some communicative ones have told us that they
have thereby gained a clearer notion than they ever entertained before
of the value of such works as the _Encyclopædia Britannica_, Chambers’s
_Encyclopædia_, Haydn’s _Dictionary of Dates_, Dr. Brewer’s _Phrase and
Fable_, the _Imperial Dictionary_, and Chambers’s _Book of Days_.
We noticed that THE GIRL’S OWN PAPER volumes had proved to many a
perfect library of knowledge and, indeed, it is not too much to say
that a diligent study of the back numbers of this periodical would have
enabled anyone to answer nearly all the questions without consulting
any other work whatever.
A pleasing feature in the competition was that girls, as a general
rule, improved as they went on. One who had a third-class place at
the start would end in the second rank, and a second-class girl would
become a first. This is as it should be. Few—hardly any—began well and
then relapsed into inaccuracy and carelessness.
A good number—but not so many as we expected—failed to send in all the
three instalments of papers. Sometimes, perhaps, they grew tired, and
sometimes illness and circumstances over which they had not control may
have prevented them. These, of course—if they have obtained a place at
all—have not got so good a place as if they had replied, or tried to
reply, to the whole seventy-two questions.
The most important feature of the answers was accuracy, and both in
that and in the manner in which the sense was expressed, competitors
did very well indeed. Where the answers admitted of a difference of
opinion, we saw many signs of intelligence and of a desire to think
and investigate for oneself that cannot be too strongly commended and
encouraged.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account