The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1009, April 29, 1899Various
General
The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1009, April 29, 1899
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals
Occasionally girls were rather sparing of their words. Brevity may be
the soul of wit, but it does not quench one’s thirst for information.
A yes, a no, a name, or a date, neither makes entertaining reading nor
forms a sufficient test of a girl’s knowledge of the subject under
discussion. But we have nothing but praise for a girl—though she did
not win a certificate—who says, “I have not given long answers, but I
have done my best.”
We said that neatness would count, and in some cases the want of it was
what told against a girl, turning the scale and landing her in a class
lower than she would otherwise have occupied.
What reasonable excuse can be given for one who writes, with perhaps
careless penmanship, on paper of all sizes, and of different colours
too, and with rough edges, as if it had been torn in the rudest manner
out of a copybook? If our untidy friends went to call on a stranger,
they would surely wish to look smart, and by looking smart to create
a good impression. Now, sending even a scrap of paper to anyone—let
it be a letter or anything else—to which our name is attached is just
like paying a visit. What we send should be made to look as neat as we
ourselves would wish to be if we went in person.
We do not say that a good paper in this competition was invariably a
neat one, or that originality and freshness had not sometimes an untidy
appearance, but the general rule was that if a girl had taken real
pains, she showed it in the manner in which she turned out her work, as
well as in the matter.
A bit of ribbon, a paper-fastener, an illuminated letter, the ruling of
a line, the folding of a page—these may be trifles, but we are judged
by trifles when there is no other means of judging. So, you girls who
have occasioned these remarks—only a few in number you were—be very
careful next time.
Here is another weak point. Why don’t some girls obey rules? The papers
were to be fastened together—see the rules—and some did not fasten
them. They were to be fastened at the left-hand top corner—see the
rules—and some did it on the right. The name was to be put on the back
of the last page of each instalment—see the rules—and some put it on
the front page. Names and ages were to be given—see the rules—and no
fewer than twenty papers failed to find a place because their writers
had omitted one or other of these two important particulars.
We want our girls to be models of common sense, and does not common
sense suggest that by obeying instructions we get more consideration
than if we do not? It is only a bit of worldly wisdom, girls, for all
who take part in competitions, that you ought to try to keep examiners
in a genial humour. Never ruffle their patience if you can avoid it.
Sometimes a little neglect gives a good deal of trouble that ought to
have been saved. However, we shall let defaulters off this time with
a caution that if they ever appear before our High Court again on a
similar charge, we shall be a great deal more severe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account