The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX, No. 1022, July 29, 1899Various
General
The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX, No. 1022, July 29, 1899
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals
I must say a few words at the outset on the terrible scourge of these
islands, which most people call consumption, and the medical profession
phthisis. The question “Is it hereditary?” stares us in the face at
once whenever we think of it, and it is a somewhat difficult one to
answer. I myself do not believe in heredity in the ordinary sense of
the word as applied to disease. A beautiful young shoot of wood may
spring from a fast-decaying tree, and if this be transplanted into
good soil, it will grow as well as any other. What holds good as
regards vegetable life cannot of course be shown to be quite true as
regards animal, nevertheless there is a certain analogy. Consumption
we believe to be infectious; if so, it is caused by a disease germ.
Now your old-school hereditists would tell us that this germ descends
from mother to child. In some cases it does or may, but the child very
soon succumbs to _tabes mesenterica_, or some other terrible infantile
disease. A germ will do one of two things: it will either assert itself
very speedily, or be killed in the system. Nature sets about at once
getting rid of these disease germs, supposing them to exist at the time
of birth. She brings, among other organs of relief, the absorbents
and glands into play; there is a struggle for life, in which nature
often fails, because those very glands become overladen and diseased,
tubercle being formed and multiplied within them. Nature does her
best, but she is beaten—another proof of the struggle betwixt what we
call evil and good, which is constantly going on in this world.
Well, on the other hand, if the child is born of delicate parents,
but free from germs, it has, if carefully fed, nursed, and tended, a
very excellent chance of growing up well. It is difficult to conceive
of a child having germs of, say, consumption in its system and these
lying latent or dormant until she is a certain age, and then springing
suddenly into life after she has suffered from some exposure and caught
cold in the chest. There are easier theories than this by far and
away to account for the children of consumptive parents dying of the
same disease in their later teens. Besides, that word “latent” may be
convenient, but it is a shockingly unmeaning one. I remember my father
buying for a good round sum a few grains of wheat that were said to
have been in the grasp of a mummy for a thousand years. The wheat when
sown grew most certainly. It may never have been in the hands of a
mummy at all, but it _may_ have been. If so, it was surrounded by dead
matter, it was hermetically sealed against any influence that could
cause it to germinate. Life was latent or asleep. But in the human body
germs have no chance of dorminating, for so constant are the changes,
that everything is constantly getting shifted, and by the time a man or
woman is fifty he or she may have used up a score of bodies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account