The Gnostic CrucifixionMead, G. R. S. (George Robert Stow)
Religion
The Gnostic Crucifixion
Mead, G. R. S. (George Robert Stow)
Gnosticism; Jesus Christ -- Crucifixion
"It was by emanating from this Power (_sci._, Incomprehensible Silence)
that Thought-in-onlyness became two.
"Yet was He, (the Supernal Father) one; for having her (_sci._ Thought) in
Himself He was alone [that is, all-one, or only, that is one-ly]. He was
not, however, [in this state] 'first,' although transcendent; it was only
in manifesting Himself from Himself that He became 'second' [that is to
say, as He who stands]. Nay, He was not even called 'Father' till Thought
named Him 'Father.'
"As, therefore, Himself pro-ducing Himself by means of Himself, He
manifested to Himself His own Thought; so also His Thought on manifesting
did not make [Him], but beholding Him, she concealed the Father, that is
the Power, in Herself, and is [thus] male-female, Power and Thought.
"Thence is it that they partner one another (for Power in no way differs
from Thought) and yet are one. From the things Above is discovered Power,
and from those Below Thought.
"So is it, too, with that which is manifested from them; namely, that
though it (_sci._ the Middle Distance, Incomprehensible Air) is one, it is
found to be two, male-female, having the female in itself.
"Thus is Mind in Thought--inseparable from one another, which though one
are yet found to be two."
I believe that our Vision of the Cross sets forth in living symbol
precisely what is explained above in more "abstract" terms. It would,
however, be a mistake to make abstractions of these sublime ideas; they
must be realized as fullnesses, as transcendent realities. The Air, the
Batos, the Middle Distance, is the manifestation, or thinking-manifest, of
the Divine to Itself, the true meaning of _mā-yā_. (See the
Trismegistic Sermon, "Though Unmanifest God is most Manifest," and the
commentary, _H._, ii., 99-109).
11. I have translated the term διαπηξἁμενος by "cross-beaming," for
διαπἡγιον is a "cross-beam"; and I would refer the reader to the famous
myth of Plato known as "The Vision of Er," where the same idea is set
forth when we read:
"There they saw the extremities of the Boundaries of the Heaven, extended
in the midst of the Light; for this Light was the final Boundary of
Heaven--_somewhat like the undergirdings of ships_--and thus confined its
whole revolution." (See _H._, i., 440.)
This "cross-beaming" or operation of the Cross is the mode of the
energizing of the Logos. It is the simultaneous separating and joining of
the generable and the ingenerable, the two modes of the Self-generable; it
is the link between personal and impersonal, bound and free, finite and
infinite. It is the instrument of creation, male-female in one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account