The Goose-step: A Study of American EducationSinclair, Upton
History
The Goose-step: A Study of American Education
Sinclair, Upton
Education -- United States; Universities and colleges -- United States
The Columbia faculty at this time was preparing for real action, and
Butler had his hands full smoothing them down. He sent one of his deans
to see Professor Beard, and plead with him not to push the issue; the
trustees had learned their lesson, said Butler, the incident would never
be repeated. Also, if Beard forced the matter he would greatly
inconvenience Butler, who was just then in trouble with his trustees
because of his pacifist activities. No more professors would be
dismissed from Columbia, except with the consent of their departments,
so Butler promised; but he kept this promise no more than he kept
others. Soon afterwards he got rid of Leon Fraser, and after that of
another member of the faculty. Butler had promised that all nominations
for promotion should come from the faculty; but soon afterwards he sent
an ambassador to Beard, to say that a certain man whom the department
proposed to promote would be refused promotion by the trustees; so the
man was not named for promotion—and Butler was able to go on saying that
all moves for promotion in Columbia came from the various departments!
Professor Beard had had enough, and handed in his resignation, in which
he paid his respects to “the few obscure and willful trustees who now
dominate the university and terrorize the young instructors.” Discussing
the subject of academic tenure, he said: “The status of a professor in
Columbia is lower than that of a manual laborer.”
CHAPTER XI
THE TWILIGHT ZONE
A well known American scientist made to me the statement that there has
not been a man of distinction called to Columbia in ten years, nor has
one arisen there. To attribute so much to Butler and his interlocking
trustees might seem to credit them with superhuman maleficence; but the
scientist explained the phenomenon, as follows: American university
teachers are greatly underpaid; there is no first class man who could
not get more money if he turned his energies to other pursuits. If he
stays as a teacher it is because he loves the work, and is willing to
accept his reward in other forms—in the respect of his fellow men. But
if he finds that he has no standing and no power; if he sees himself and
his colleagues browbeaten and insulted by commercial persons; if he
knows that all the world pays no attention to his opinions, assuming him
to be the puppet of commercial persons—then the dignity of the academic
life is gone, and nothing is left but an inadequate money reward.
What you have at Columbia is a host of inferior men, dwelling, as one
phrased it to me, in “a twilight zone of mediocrity”; dull pedants,
raking over the dust heaps of learning and occupying their minds with
petty problems of administration. They have full power to decide whether
Greek shall be given in nine courses or nine and one-half, also whether
it shall count for four credits or four and a quarter. “And we love
that,” said one to me, with a bitter sneer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account