The Grand Fleet, 1914-1916 : $b its creation, development and workJellicoe, John Rushworth
History
The Grand Fleet, 1914-1916 : $b its creation, development and work
Jellicoe, John Rushworth
Great Britain. Royal Navy; Jutland, Battle of, 1916; World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations
The Grand Fleet Battle Orders provided for considerable
decentralisation of command, and great stress was laid on this point in
the general instructions for “Battle Tactics.” The opening paragraphs
of this section of the Battle Orders emphasised this strongly. It
was pointed out that whilst the Commander-in-Chief would control the
movements of the whole Battle Fleet before and on deployment (except
in the extreme case of very low visibility rendering it necessary for
the Flag officer of a wing division to take immediate action), he could
not be certain of doing so after deployment, when funnel and other
smoke made both vision and communication difficult. The necessity for
wide decentralisation of command was then pointed out, combined with a
close watch on the movements of the Commander-in-Chief, with which Flag
officers should generally conform.
The Battle of Jutland was the first Fleet action since Trafalgar if
we except the actions in the Russo-Japanese War, and advantage was
naturally taken of the experience to make some changes in the Battle
Orders; but there were no surprises in the way of enemy tactics, and,
therefore, no radical alterations were necessary. As the Chief of the
Staff remarked to me during the Battle Fleet engagement, “This is all
going according to expectation.” We did, however, obtain confirmation
of our views as to the probable retiring tactics that would be adopted
by the German fleet.
The principal changes that were made in the Battle Orders were in the
direction of laying still further emphasis on the discretionary power
which was vested in Flag Officers commanding squadrons, owing to the
difficulty, always clearly recognised, and confirmed at Jutland, which
the Commander-in-Chief would experience in controlling the movements of
the whole Fleet in the heat of action; also in defining still further
the different movements that might be adopted to deal with torpedo
attacks, whether the torpedoes were fired from battleships or from
destroyers.
A very exhaustive analysis of the subject of torpedo attacks in
action had been prepared by my Staff during the spring of 1916, and
a memorandum, with diagrams, had been written showing the various
situations that might arise and the effect of the different
counter-movements in each case. It is of interest to note that this
memorandum was on the point of issue when the Jutland Battle was
fought. It was dated May 27th, 1916, but it had not actually been
issued.
The experience gained at Jutland was embodied in the memorandum before
it was finally issued to the Fleet.
The questions of the use of the torpedo in action and the “counter”
measures adopted have been dealt with at considerable length, since
this form of attack and its “counter” have been much discussed in the
Service since 1911, and it is a subject on which discussion is likely
to continue. It is also certain that it will form the subject of much
future experiment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account