The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)Benda, Julien
Philosophy
The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)
Benda, Julien
Intellectuals; Nationalism; Philosophy, Modern
I shall point out another characteristic of patriotism in the modern
‘clerk’: xenophobia. The hatred of man for ‘the man from outside’ (the
_horsain_), his rejection of and scorn for everything which is not
‘from his own home’, all these impulses, so constant among peoples and
apparently necessary to their existence, have been adopted in our days
by the so-called men of thought, and adopted with a seriousness of
application, _an absence of simple-mindedness_, which go far towards
making this adoption worthy of notice. We know how systematically the
mass of German teachers in the past fifty years have announced the
decline of every civilization but that of their own race, and how in
France the admirers of Nietzsche or Wagner, even of Kant or Goethe,
were treated by Frenchmen who claimed to share in the life of the
spirit.[42] You may estimate how curiously new this form of patriotism
is among the men of thought in France by thinking of Lamartine, Victor
Hugo, Michelet, Proudhon, Renan, to name only patriotic ‘clerks’ in the
age immediately preceding that we are considering. Is it necessary to
say once again how much the ‘clerks’ have stimulated the passion of the
laymen by adopting this xenophobia?
I shall be told that during the past fifty years, and especially
during the twenty years before the war, the attitude of foreigners to
France was such that the most violent national partiality was forced
upon all Frenchmen who wished to safeguard the nation, and that the
only true patriots were those who consented to this fanaticism. I say
nothing to the contrary; I only say that the ‘clerks’ who indulged
in this fanaticism betrayed their duty, which is precisely to set
up a corporation whose sole cult is that of justice and of truth,
in opposition to the peoples and the injustice to which they are
condemned by their religions of this earth. It is true indeed that
these new ‘clerks’ declare that they do not know what is meant by
justice, truth, and other ‘metaphysical fogs’, that for them the true
is determined by the useful, the just by circumstances. All these
things were taught by Callicles, but with this difference; he revolted
all the important thinkers of his time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account