The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)Benda, Julien
Philosophy
The great betrayal (La trahison des clercs)
Benda, Julien
Intellectuals; Nationalism; Philosophy, Modern
‘The most striking thing about Jesus when he consents to pay tribute
to Caesar and refuses the crown which the people offer him in the
desert, is not so much his prudence and his disinterestedness, as his
patriotism ... One of the most important characteristics of Jesus’s
teaching is its absolutely national character....’[68]
If the reader desires, he will himself go and find out the solidity
of the proofs on which these teachers base their thesis (one of these
proofs is that Jesus was strongly attached to the institutions of his
nation, which he showed by accepting circumcision eight days after he
was born). The point I wish to insist on is the eagerness of these
Christians to make their Master a supporter of national egotism, at
least at one period of his life.
These views on the attitude of the Church towards nationalism seem to
me to remain unmodified by the recent declarations of the Holy See
concerning a certain type of French nationalism, for these declarations
only condemn an openly anti-Christian nationalism (hence a very
exceptional form of nationalism) and do not utter a word of blame for
the desire of the peoples to set themselves up as distinct from others
and to reject universalism. Moreover, this is how a universalist is
answered by a publication which is to some extent the official organ of
Pontifical views:
‘Yes, all men are sons of one Father; but they were divided in the
beginning and have never been brought together again. The family was
broken up and never joined up again. On the contrary. Certainly, I am
glad to recognize the fraternity of all living beings; but are all
the dead our fathers? Have they all loved us? Have they all suffered
and laboured for us? Some lived on the other side of the globe, and,
so to speak, in another world. Some laboured against us, or, if
they supported our ancestors, it was in the hope of safeguarding or
enriching their own bequest to others, not to us. Where is the debt?
If the home is open to all comers, it is no longer a home but an
inn.’[69]
It appears that we must look among those who have left the Church,
to find Christian ministers who proclaim the true teaching of their
Master, and who declare with no beating about the bush: ‘The Gospel of
Jesus does not imply any country, but obliterates the fatherland.’[70]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account