The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
No inquisition had been held (as the law required) to establish the
right to make the Patent. Nor did any official notification of it
apprise the Crown or the public of what had been done. A spell of
black magic transmuted a military appointment into a life estate
in the richest fishery in Ulster, and attached thereto a bogus
“Admiralty.”
Uglier even than the uncanny graft on the “command” at Carrickfergus
was Sir Arthur’s crookedness as to the Bann. The river was nowhere
mentioned in either King’s Letter from first to last; yet the new
Patent captured it for Chichester. Ecclesiastics as well as laymen
owned the stream on either bank. It belonged to Hugh O’Neill in
part, to Sir Randal McDonnell in part, to the Bishop of Derry, to
the Bishop of Down and Connor, and other magnates. They never learnt
till too late that, by imposing the Great Seal on skins of vellum,
Sir Arthur had stolen their property. The fresh-water “Admiral” kept
his scrivenery secret until its victims were powerless and his sway
assured. His day was coming; and the spirit in which he trampled down
public and private ownership proves that the embittered captains
of Elizabeth never intended to respect the treaties of peace which
heralded the dawn of the Stuart reign. Chichester had as little
compunction in thwarting the policy of James I. as in stripping
chiefs and clansmen of their acres.
To baffle research as to his misdeeds, he inserted a proviso in the
Patents of 1604 declaring that those of 1603 should be annulled
before their substitutes were sealed. He had cunningly left them
unenrolled, lest their contents should rise up in judgment against
him, and thus they were for ever withheld from scrutiny and
subtracted from the archives of the State. Knowledge of them is
derived only from the King’s Letter and recitals in the Patents of
1604. The germ of the stranger’s claim to Lough Neagh and the Bann,
thus clandestinely called into being, animates the unnatural pedigree
of the Chichester title. In no essay of his descendants to trace it
back through the centuries to some legitimate source, nor in their
lawsuits to maintain a hold on what he filched, are the Patents of
1603-4 ever mentioned. In no legal proceedings concerning the Bann or
Lough Neagh (and they were frequent) was the pretenced life-estate
ever relied on or referred to. A modern affidavit, which boasts
a complete and accurate enumeration of the grants, piously avers
that the first was issued in 1606, and suppresses those of 1603-4.
The guilt-dyed originals were left buried out of sight, as if no
tell-tale ghosts haunted the Record Office. Yet they represented the
fairest flower of the handicraft which typified the majesty of the
law in Ireland when the Brehon Code was overthrown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account