The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
Cecil was favourable to Sir Arthur, and the Lord Lieutenant doubtless
reflected that to extend his “command” to embrace Lough Neagh would
only increase his responsibility without enriching his estate or
enlarging his pay. They, therefore, furthered Chichester’s petition
without troubling as to the purpose to which an “amended” King’s
Letter might be turned. In the first profuse year of the Stuart
regime, small scrutiny was spent by James I. on requests of this
kind. Once Devonshire and Cecil backed up a suppliant’s prayer, no
difficulty was made in yielding it. His Majesty accordingly, on the
29th December, 1603, consented to sign a second Letter; and thereby
became anew the victim of servitors who prostituted regal forms to
corrupt ends.
The difference between the first and second King’s Letter related
chiefly to the “command” of Lough Neagh; but that difference enabled
the craftsmen to effect a far-reaching extension of the Patent it
authorised. The “amended” Letter was drawn to invest Chichester with
“the government of Carrickfergus and of all other forts, places, and
commands, with the Lough Neagh and the commodities thereof mentioned
in our Letters Patent formerly granted unto him, together with the
fee of 13s. 4d. by the day, for the term of his natural life.” This
phraseology shows that although Lough Neagh had never been mentioned
in the first King’s Letter, a patent was founded on it which
illegally dealt with the Lough.
On the strength of the new Letter, the rogues minted a fresh Patent
on the 9th May, 1604. This revealed the original design and reeked
with every kind of illegality. Having declared Chichester “Colonel
and Governor of our forces at Carrickfergus,” with the fee of 13s.
4d. a day for life, it created him “Admiral and Commander-in-Chief
of Lough Neagh for the disposal of all shipping and boats thereon.”
There was daring in that, but a greater marvel followed, for the
Patent thievishly went on to confer on him “the fishing of the said
Lough as far as the Salmon Leap in the River of the Bann.” In other
words, it annexed to the command at Carrickfergus a life estate
in the fishery of Lough Neagh and the Bann. This was a stupendous
encroachment on the nature and limits of the grant sanctioned by
the King. To transform a military “command” into the gift of a huge
fishery, and adjoin thereto the rank of “Admiral,” was a masterpiece
of perversion. The English Crown had never laid claim to the waters
so purloined. James I. did not mean to give them away; and had
neither power nor right to do so. The feigned dignity of “Admiral and
Commander-in-Chief of Lough Neagh” was usurped to mask a material
advantage, and its author vainly tried afterwards to confirm his
shaky title by dubbing the lake “Lough Chichester.” The mock baptism
was as scornfully rejected by the natives as his piratical claim of
ownership.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account