The great fraud of UlsterHealy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
History
The great fraud of Ulster
Healy, T. M. (Timothy Michael)
Ireland -- History -- 17th century; Ulster (Northern Ireland and Ireland) -- History
Between 1603 and 1606 the absentee Lord Lieutenant advised the
Privy Council on Irish affairs; and, by correspondence with his
subordinates, loosely governed Ireland. He befriended Hugh O’Neill,
and his death left the Earl without a protector at Court, where
Chichester sought to instil poison against the Ulster lords, in
order to forfeit their territories for his own benefit. Devonshire
had, a few months before his death, gone through a form of marriage
with Lady Rich, greatly to the King’s displeasure. The ceremony
was performed by his chaplain, Laud—who afterwards perished on
the scaffold under Charles I. as Archbishop. Devonshire’s will
(signed the day before he died) shows plainly that he was party
to the unmiraculous multiplication of loaves and fishes by the
Patent-mongers.
The frame of the will (a long Latin document) makes it evident that
he was ignorant of the giving of the power-of-attorney by Wakeman to
Auditor Ware to enable Hamilton to annex the tidal Bann. One of the
executors, Sir William Godolphin, was the lessee of that fishery from
the Crown under a demise made during the rebellion in 1600; and he
would hardly have kept silent had he learnt of the making of a grant
which might affect his lease. The will appointed John Wakeman and
John King “trustees” to enable Lady Rich to receive “the residue” of
grants to which they were entitled under the King’s Letter, though
that was already long exhausted. This was an ugly disclosure to
appear in the hurried will of a dying Statesman, for it made plain
that the intent of the King’s Letter to recoup “money paid to an
ancient and well-deserving servant in Scotland” was a mere device to
benefit the Lord Lieutenant. The appointment of Cecil as one of the
executors revealed the fact that the Secretary of State was also in
the secret.
Other Court nobles, including Lord Southampton, the patron of
Shakespeare, were named executors, and were thus saddled with notice
that the Royal revenues had been made away with, and were to be
further embezzled for a misliked woman. Yet they made no protest and
asked no questions. This put them all in Chichester’s power, and
emboldened him in depredation. On the 25th April, 1606, he wrote to
Cecil praying that his letters to the late Lord Lieutenant should not
be allowed to fall into the hands of any other member of the Privy
Council; and that “all my papers” in the dead man’s drawers should be
taken up by Cecil. This was treating the Secretary of State on the
footing of an accomplice, and Devonshire as a fellow-culprit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account