The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National AdvantageAngell, Norman
History
The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage
Angell, Norman
Commercial policy; Disarmament; Imperialism; War; War, Cost of
In every civilized State, revenues which are drawn from a
territory are expended on that territory, and there is no
process known to modern government by which wealth may first be
drawn from a territory into the treasury and then be
redistributed with a profit to the individuals who have
contributed it, or to others. It would be just as reasonable to
say that the citizens of London are richer than the citizens of
Birmingham because London has a richer treasury; or that
Londoners would become richer if the London County Council were
to annex the county of Hertford; as to say that people's wealth
varies according to the size of the administrative area which
they inhabit. The whole thing is, as I have called it, an
optical illusion, due to the hypnotism of an obsolete
terminology. Just as poverty may be greater in the large city
than in the small one, and taxation heavier, so the citizens of
a great State may be poorer than the citizens of a small one,
as they very often are. Modern government is mainly, and tends
to become entirely, a matter of administration. A mere
jugglery with the administrative entities, the absorption of
small States into large ones, or the breaking up of large
States into small, is not of itself going to affect the matter
one way or the other.
CHAPTER IV
THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF CONFISCATION
Our present terminology of international politics an historical
survival--Wherein modern conditions differ from ancient--The
profound change effected by Division of Labor--The delicate
interdependence of international finance--Attila and the
Kaiser--What would happen if a German invader looted the Bank of
England--German trade dependent upon English credit--Confiscation
of an enemy's property an economic impossibility under modern
conditions--Intangibility of a community's wealth.
During the Victorian Jubilee procession an English beggar was heard to
say:
I own Australia, Canada, New Zealand, India, Burmah, and the
Islands of the Far Pacific; and I am starving for want of a
crust of bread. I am a citizen of the greatest Power of the
modern world, and all people should bow to my greatness. And
yesterday I cringed for alms to a negro savage, who repulsed me
with disgust.
What is the meaning of this?
The meaning is that, as very frequently happens in the history of ideas,
our terminology is a survival of conditions no longer existing, and our
mental conceptions follow at the tail of our vocabulary. International
politics are still dominated by terms applicable to conditions which the
processes of modern life have altogether abolished.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account