The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National AdvantageAngell, Norman
History
The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage
Angell, Norman
Commercial policy; Disarmament; Imperialism; War; War, Cost of
And it is to be noted in this connection that the difficulties of 1872
were trifling compared to what they would necessarily be in our day. In
1872, Germany was self-sufficing, little dependent upon credit; to-day
undisturbed credit in Europe is the very life-blood of her industry; it
is, in fact, the very food of her people, as the events of 1911 have
sufficiently proved.
It is not generally realized how abundantly the whole history of the
German indemnity bears out Sir Robert Giffen's warning; how this flood
of gold turned indeed to dust and ashes as far as the German nation is
concerned.
First, anyone familiar with financial problems might have expected that
the receipt of so large a sum of money by Germany would cause prices to
rise and so handicap export trade in competition with France, where the
reverse process would cause prices to fall. This result was, in fact,
produced. M. Paul Beaulieu and M. Léon Say[19] have both shown that this
factor operated through the value of commercial bills of exchange,
giving to the French exporter a bonus and to the German a handicap which
affected trade most perceptibly. Captain Bernard Serrigny, who has
collected in his work a wealth of evidence bearing on this subject,
writes:
The rise in prices influenced seriously the cost of production,
and the German manufacturers fought, in consequence, at a
disadvantage with England and France. Finally the goods
produced at this high cost were thrown upon the home market at
the moment when the increase in the cost of living was
diminishing seriously the purchasing power of the bulk of
consumers. These goods had to compete, not only with home
over-production due to the failure to sell abroad, but with
foreign goods, which, despite the tariff, were by their lower
price able to push their way into the German market, where
relatively higher prices attracted them. In this competition
France was particularly prominent. In France the lack of
metallic money had engendered great financial caution, and had
considerably lowered prices all around, so that there was a
general financial and commercial condition very different from
that in Germany, where the payment of the indemnity had been
followed by reckless speculation. Moreover, owing to the heavy
foreign payments made by France, bills drawn on foreign centres
were at a premium, a premium which constituted a sensible
additional profit to French exporters, so considerable in
certain cases that it was worth while for French manufacturers
to sell their goods at an actual loss in order to realize the
profit on the bill of exchange. The German market was thus
being captured by the French at the very moment when the
Germans supposed they would, thanks to the indemnity, be
starting out to capture the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account