The Great Steel Strike and its LessonsFoster, William Z.
History
The Great Steel Strike and its Lessons
Foster, William Z.
Steel Strike, U.S., 1919-1920; United States Steel Corporation
Mr. Gary received the Commission courteously and after
minutely cross-examining them concerning the "anonymous"
report of the presence of "Bolsheviks" among them, he heard
the Commission to the extent of learning the first step in
their proposal. He made his reply immediately, an absolute
refusal of arbitration or mediation. The Commission
therefore never had any opportunity to present the
authorized acceptance of the mediation plan by the other
side and in no sense conveyed to Mr. Gary the extent of the
concessions which the strikers were then willing to make.
Mr. Gary, however, clearly understood that acceptance of the
mediation plan would mean that the men would all return to
work at once.
Mr. Gary based his refusal on the grounds that any dealings
which in any way involved representatives of the men then on
strike would be an acceptance of the closed shop, sovietism,
and the forcible distribution of property. Mr. Gary said
that if the Commission represented the men who had gone back
to work, those men were content; if the Commission
represented the men who had not gone back to work, those men
are nothing but red radicals whom the plants did not want
anyway. He said that there was absolutely no issue for
discussion with the U. S. Steel Corporation.
The Commission presented its viewpoint on the advisability
of mediation at great length and with insistence. Mr. Gary
did not in any respect modify his immediate decision.
The Commission felt it necessary therefore to drop the plan
and transmitted the following to the National Committee:
December 6, 1919
Memorandum for Mr. Fitzpatrick:
The independent Commission of Inquiry, instituted by the
Interchurch World Movement to investigate the steel strike,
received on December 2 a communication marked
"confidential," dealing with an official action taken by the
National Committee for Organizing Iron and Steel Workers,
signed by Mr. Fitzpatrick and Mr. Foster.
On December 5, members of the Commission informally
conversed with Mr. Gary for two hours, proposing to plan a
new basis of relations in the steel industry, with an ending
of the strike best calculated to further better relations.
They offered to act as mediators both on behalf of the men
still on strike, whose leaders were to order them back and
then step out of the situation, and on behalf of still
dissatisfied men who had nevertheless returned to work.
Mr. Gary refused to confer with these representatives of the
churches as mediators in behalf of any interests represented
by you in the strike, on the ground that the men still out
were Bolshevist radicals who were not wanted in the mills
and who would not be taken back.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account