The Great Steel Strike and its LessonsFoster, William Z.
History
The Great Steel Strike and its Lessons
Foster, William Z.
Steel Strike, U.S., 1919-1920; United States Steel Corporation
The immediate cause of this break merits explanation. The National
Committee, at the outset of the strike, organized a publicity
department, headed by Mr. Edwin Newdick, formerly of the National War
Labor Board. In addition to getting out strike stories for the press,
many of which were written by the well-known novelist, Mary Heaton
Vorse, this department assembled and issued in printed bulletin form
statistical information relative to the progress and effectiveness of
the strike. The steel companies, through spies in the unions,
newspapers, etc., disputed this information, telling the strikers that
they were being victimized as the mills in all districts except their
own were in full operation, and advising them to send out committees to
investigate the situation.
It was a seductive argument and many were deceived by it. Consequently,
quite generally, such committees (usually financed and chaperoned by the
local Chambers of Commerce) went forth from various localities. Of
course, they returned the sort of reports the companies wished. Much
harm was done thereby. The Steubenville district suffered from the lying
statement of such a committee, the strikers having made a winning fight
up till the time it was made public, the middle of November. But nowhere
was the effect so serious as in the Wheeling district.
The Wheeling committee was headed by one Robert Edwards, widely known
for years as an extreme radical. It visited many points in the steel
industry, taking its figures on steel production and strike conditions
from employers' sources, and completely ignoring national and local
strike officials everywhere. The ensuing report pictured the steel
industry as virtually normal. Although he had been recently expelled
from the Amalgamated Association Edwards still had great influence with
the men, and his report broke their ranks. In future general strikes
drastic disciplinary measures should be taken to forestall the
activities of such committees.
* * * * *
Of the 6500 men employed by the Colorado Fuel and Iron Co. in its Pueblo
mills, 95 per cent. walked out on September 22. When the strike was
called off three and one-half months later not over 1500 of these had
returned to their jobs. Production was below 20 per cent. of normal.
Locally the tie-up was so effective that on January 9, at the biggest
labor meeting in Pueblo's history, National Committee local secretary W.
H. Young and the other organizers had to beg the men for hours to go
back to work. These officials knew that the great struggle had been
decided in the enormous steel centers of the East (Pueblo being credited
with producing only two per cent. of the nation's steel) and that it
would be madness for them to try to win the fight alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account