The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishesBertram, James Glass
Science
The Harvest of the Sea: A contribution to the natural and economic history of the British food fishes
Bertram, James Glass
Fish culture; Fisheries -- Great Britain; Fishes
the place; but no such effects made their appearance. And though there
were exceptional cases where the extra cash (for it was like found
money) obtained for the pearls was worse than wasted, there are many
who can point to a new suit of clothes or a good lever watch, when
asked what they had to show as the reward of the many cold drenchings
they got while dredging the Doon for pearls.”
In 1863 a controversy arose as to which rivers produced the best
pearls, and it was then argued that only in those streams issuing from
lochs was a continuous supply of the pearl-mussel to be found, and
although there are a few pearl streams which take their rise in some
little spring and gather volume as they flow, yet their number, as
far as is known, is only four—viz. the Ugie, Ythan, Don, and Isla—and
even these are now (1865) very nearly exhausted. Many of the finest
gems have been found in the Doon, Teith, Forth, Earn, Tay, Lyon, Spey,
Conan, etc. etc. Until this summer (1865) it has been supposed that
the lochs are the natural reservoirs of the pearl-mussel, and when
in 1860-1 a portion of Loch Venachar was laid dry for the purpose of
building a sluice for the Glasgow Waterworks, innumerable shells were
found, from which the labourers gathered a great many very fine pearls.
The above theory was thereby so much confirmed that Mr. Unger was
induced in 1864 to try further experiments on Lochs Venachar, Achray,
and Lubnaig, by means of dredging, which, considering the rough mode of
procedure, was so successful, especially on a place called Lynn Achore,
at the east end of Loch Venachar, that he at last considered himself
justified in incurring considerable expense. Accordingly he procured
this summer (1865) one of Siebes’ diving apparatus, and bringing down
one of the best divers from London, proceeded to search the bottoms
of several lochs on a systematic plan. Many obstacles were thrown in
Mr. Unger’s way by the proprietors, and although he was particularly
anxious to experiment on Loch Tay, the present Earl of Breadalbane
would not grant permission for him to do so. But with the consent of
the Earl of Moray the first regular trial was made on Loch Venachar,
and it was ascertained beyond a doubt that shells were to be found in
all the sandy shallow parts of the loch; not however in beds, as people
were led to suppose from dredging experiments, but only here and there
in clusters of a dozen or so, except at the mouth of the loch, where
they were more extensive and in larger quantities. The diver also went
down in various parts of the loch to the depth of a hundred feet,
where it was found to be quite impracticable to search for anything
so small as a pearl-mussel on account of the thick muddy bottom. Mr.
Unger, nothing daunted by this partial failure, went to Sir Robert
Menzies, who not only consented at once to his trying Loch Rannoch,
but generously placed all available boats and utensils, besides the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account