The Hastings Road and the "Happy Springs of Tunbridge" — John Shaqi
The Hastings Road and the "Happy Springs of Tunbridge"Harper, Charles G. (Charles George)
History
The Hastings Road and the "Happy Springs of Tunbridge"
Harper, Charles G. (Charles George)
England -- Description and travel; England -- Social life and customs; Hastings Road
It was an ominous place, suitable for the footpad’s leap in the dark
upon the traveller’s back, and those wayfarers who were obliged to pad
the hoof alone through Holloway when night was come wished they had
eyes in the back of the head, in addition to the usual pair. Near by
stood, and still stands, Bromley Hill House, once the seat of Charles
Long, afterwards Lord Farnborough. In the dairy at that place one John
Clarke, gardener, murdered Elizabeth Mann, a dairy-maid, and over
against Holloway there was erected a gallows, and on it John Clarke,
brought in a cart from Maidstone gaol, in due time swung.
At the threshold of Bromley stands the College, not an educational
establishment, but a superior kind of almshouse, whose purpose is
explained by the inscription set up over the doorway:
Deo et Ecclesiæ
This College for Twenty poore
widowes (of orthodox and Loyall
Clergymen) & A Chaplin was
given by Iohn Warner late L^d.
Bishop of Rochester
1666
John Warner, Bishop of Rochester, was a staunch supporter of Church
and King, in times when both the Establishment and the Monarchy were
in a bad way. Charles the First was not wholly responsible for the
troubles and tragedies of his reign. An acrid Puritanism was in the
air, and had already manifested itself, very unpleasantly, in his
father’s time. It was the inevitable reaction from the Renaissance
gaieties under Elizabeth. The times were such that, even in the first
year of Charles the First’s rule, Warner found it necessary to deliver
a bitter sermon directed against the politico-religious activities of
the Puritans, based upon the text, Matt. xxi. 38: “This is the heir;
come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.” No one had
in those early days of strife thought of beheading Charles, and we must
therefore count Warner among the prophets.
The bishop came very near being impeached before Parliament for this
exploit, and only escaped by the King stepping in and “pardoning” him
in advance of Parliamentary action.
It is not surprising to find that, when the troubles culminated in war,
the House was swift to sequestrate the bishop from his see, and even to
seize his property. They proved the innuendo of his discourse at his
own expense, he was forced to leave his palace at Bromley in disguise,
fearing for his personal safety at the hands of the saints, and for
years he wandered in poverty in the West Country. Like other survivors
of the dispossessed clergy, high-placed and low, he came to his own
again at the Restoration in 1661, but he was then an old man of eighty.
Five years later he was dead.
[Illustration: IN THE FIRST QUADRANGLE, WIDOWS’ COLLEGE, BROMLEY.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account