The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countriesParsons, Frank
History
The heart of the railroad problem: The history of railway discrimination in the United States, the chief efforts at control and the remedies proposed, with hints from other countries
Parsons, Frank
Railroads -- Freight -- Rates -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
Denver still suffers from the sort of discrimination described in the
preceding section.[313] The rate in cotton goods from New England to
Denver is $2.24 per hundred. From New England to San Francisco, 1500
miles further on, the rate is $1 a hundred in carload lots. On a
shipment in relation to which a Denver merchant made complaint, the
Burlington road received $25.95 from Chicago to Denver, whereas if the
same shipment had been intended for Frisco the Burlington would have
received only $4.50.
Salt Lake City also is wrestling with adverse freight rates. On cotton
goods the rate from New York to Frisco is $1, while on the shorter haul
from New York to Salt Lake it is just double, $2 per hundred.[314] The
rate on window-shade cloth from New York to Salt Lake City is $2.30.
Carrying it 800 miles further, New York to California, the railroads
charge only $1, and this affords a slight profit. Is it not clear that
the $2.30 is excessive?[315] “The men who build a city in the interior
cannot expect to get as reasonable a rate as the men who build their
city on the shore of the sea, but the difference should be a reasonable
one.”
It would seem that the men who build in the interior might expect that
they would not be called on to pay railway fixed charges on coast
traffic as well as on their own. It is unfair to give the coast people
the celerity of railway traffic at the cost of water traffic. The
railroad theory that every pound of freight is to be secured that will
pay the cost of hauling or a little more, though a water route or a
shorter rail line might carry the freight at less absolute cost, is not
in accord with sound public policy or the saving of industrial power. It
is an economic absurdity to haul by rail what can go more cheaply and as
safely by water. A co-operative company or a consolidated company of any
honest and sensible variety, owning both the railroads and the steamboat
lines, would divide the traffic in such a way as to secure the maximum
economy and convenience, and would make a reasonable payment for the
extra speed and other advantages of railway transit the main condition
of selecting that method of transportation, with an option in the
company under specified conditions to facilitate the full loading of
trains and boats through the adjustment of rates.
The case of Spokane is a specially aggravated one. The rate on bar iron
from Chicago to Spokane is $2.07 a hundred against $1.25 to Seattle;
iron pipe $1 to Spokane, 50 cents to Seattle; lamps $2.35 to Spokane,
$1.10 to Seattle; belting $3.13 to Spokane, and $1.65 to Seattle;
mining-car wheels $1.26 to Spokane and 85 cents to Seattle; cottons
$1.75 to Spokane, 90 cents to the coast; soap (toilet) $1.23 to Spokane,
75 cents to coast cities; wire and wire goods $2.35 to Spokane, $1.50 to
the coast; sewing machines $2.25 to Spokane, $1.40 to coast; typewriters
$5.96 to Spokane, $3 to the cities of the coast.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account