The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
In the war which resulted from the resistance to the acts specified,
was involved a great principle of self-government, which the British
government has since fully acknowledged in the treatment of all her
other colonies, but it must be confessed that there was a good deal of
turbulence and violence exhibited by American colonists in the first
stages of the contest. Without depreciating the public spirit displayed by
the people of Massachusetts during the war which ensued, there can be no
question but that by violence and rashness the conflict was precipitated,
and that much forbearance was show by some of the British military
officials. A candid review of the history of the difficulties preceding
actual hostilities must lead any honest mind to the conclusion that while
the British ministers acted unconstitutionally and unwisely, as the
quarrel approached its crisis, the people of Massachusetts, with whom the
conflict began, exhibited a very turbulent spirit and often acted with
unwarranted violence.
The settlers of Massachusetts, on account of their peculiar religious
theories, had from the very beginning, been impatient of all control from
the mother country and anxious to thrown it off. They had hailed the
Commonwealth with joy, had been greatly chagrined at the restoration of
the royal authority and had been very much embittered by the vacation
of their charter and the loss of the theocratic form of government, and
their ministry kept alive the fires of discontent and fanned them into a
flame on all occasions. The same feeling existed throughout New England.
Virginia on the contrary had been always a loyal colony and had not
acknowledged the Parliament or the Commonwealth in Cromwell's time, until
compelled to do so by a force sent for its conquest. Its people had hailed
the restoration with delight and there was no sentiment in the colony
demanding a separation from the mother country which was not engendered
by actual or supposed infringement of their rights as British subjects.
Though the people of that colony had little direct interest in the
grievances complained of against the British government, as the articles
taxed entered very little into their consumption, and no troops had been
quartered among them in an offensive manner since the Parliamentary
expedition, they made common cause with the people of Massachusetts, as
it was a question of power which involved the rights of all the colonies.
The difference was that the people of Massachusetts and New England were
anxious to bring on a separation, while those of Virginia were not, unless
it was necessary for the protection of the rights of all of the colonies.
The statesmen of Virginia entered warmly into the dispute both by speaking
and writing, and when the actual collision took place the people sprang to
arms and sent to Massachusetts aid in both men and provisions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account