The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United StatesEarly, Jubal Anderson
History
The Heritage of The South: A History of the Introduction of Slavery; Its Establishment From Colonial Times and Final Effect Upon the Politics of the United States
Early, Jubal Anderson
Slavery -- United States; United States -- Politics and government -- 1861-1865
It was the attempt to coerce the people of Massachusetts, in an
unconstitutional manner, to compliance with unconstitutional laws, on the
part of the British government, more than any actual grievances of their
own, that aroused the people of Virginia to action, as that coercion if
successfully applied to one colony, might be used for the destruction of
all self-government in the others. This became the traditional policy of
Virginia as a sovereign State. After the struggle began, she gave a leader
to the continental army, her wisest and best statesmen to the colonial
councils, her arms-bearing citizens to the ranks, and her resources to the
prosecution of the war. That war which was begun in Massachusetts, long
after it ceased to exist within the limits of that State, was finally,
practically, ended on the soil of Virginia, after that soil had been
terribly ravaged by the invading armies of Great Britain.
Motives similar to those which actuated Virginia, prompted the action of
all of the other Southern colonies, and none suffered greater losses in
war for the common defence than South Carolina. This statement is not made
in order to claim for Virginia and the other Southern States more than
their due share of credit for services in the war of the Revolution, nor
to depreciate the valuable services rendered by the more northern states
of the confederation.
The war was prosecuted by the colonies as a confederacy of sovereign
States. The Continental Congress was in fact but a congress of
commissioners or embassadors, whose acts derived their validity from the
tacit adoption and sanction of the several States, and the delegates
were at all times subject to recall and substitution, by the appointment
of others--a power which was repeatedly exercised. The Declaration
of Independence itself, was made in accordance with powers expressly
delegated for that purpose to the representatives of the several
appointing powers, and derived its force not from the action of Congress,
but from the adoption of that action by those represented in that body.
In the case of Virginia, her independence had been declared by a
convention of her own, and a State Government had been actually organized
in advance of the action of Congress, and she was the first thus to
assert her sovereignty. On the 15th of May, 1776, the Virginia convention
resolved to adopt a bill of rights and frame a State government, and on
the 29th of June following, the government was put into operation by the
election of a governor and other officers--a Bill of Rights and State
Constitution having been framed and adopted in the meantime.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account