The Highland bagpipe : $b its history, literature, and music: with some account of the traditions, superstitions, and anecdotes relating to the instrument and its tunesManson, W. L. (William Laird)
History
The Highland bagpipe : $b its history, literature, and music: with some account of the traditions, superstitions, and anecdotes relating to the instrument and its tunes
Manson, W. L. (William Laird)
Bagpipe
A.D. 1118.—Giraldus Cambrensis, the historian, mentions the pipes about
this date as Welsh and Irish, but not as Scottish. But _The Complaynt of
Scotland_, written in 1548, states that the instrument was a favourite
with the Scottish peasantry “from the earliest periods.” Another
trustworthy record says it was in use in Scotland and Wales about the
end of the twelfth century. Besides, Pennant in his _Tour_ was told that
it was mentioned in the oldest northern songs as the “soeck-pipe.” There
is little doubt it was cultivated to some extent in Scotland in the
twelfth century.
A.D. 1136.—There are, or at least were, in Melrose Abbey, built in 1136,
two carvings representing bagpipes, but they are not supposed to be of a
date so early as the abbey itself. The first, that of an aged musician,
is given in Sir John Graham Dalziel’s _Musical Memoirs of Scotland_,
published in 1849, but it cannot now be found in the abbey. If it
existed when the book was written, it has succumbed since then to the
action of the elements or the vandalism of the ignorant. The second,
sketched on the spot, is one of those grotesque carvings which artists
of early days, in what must have been a sarcastic humour, delighted in
affixing to sacred buildings. It is a gargoyle in the form of a pig
carrying a rude bagpipe under its head with the drone, the only pipe now
remaining, on its left shoulder, and its fore feet, what is left of
them, clasped around the bag. The mouth is open and the rain water off
the roof runs through it. There is a tradition that as James IV. was not
agreeing very well with the Highlanders the pig playing their favourite
instrument was placed in the abbey as a satire. The chapel, however, on
the outside of the nave of which the carving is, was built before the
time of James IV. It is curious that all, or nearly all, the carvings on
the outside of the abbey are ugly, some of them gruesome, while the
figures on the inside are beautiful. This, it is supposed, was meant to
convey the idea of Heaven inside and earth outside. In the architecture
of the middle ages the gargoyle, or waterspout, assumed a vast variety
of forms, often frightful, fantastic or grotesque. So the carving in
Melrose Abbey may be simply the product of the artist’s imagination.
Besides, a French architect had a good deal to do with the abbey, so the
designs may not all be emblematic of Scottish life of the date when they
were made. In _Musical Memoirs of Scotland_ it is stated that the
instrument had two drones, one on each side of the animal’s head, and a
chanter which hung beneath its feet, these latter being placed on the
apertures. The figure seems to have been very much worn away since this
book was written.
[Illustration:
CARVINGS IN MELROSE ABBEY
]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account