The Highland bagpipe : $b its history, literature, and music: with some account of the traditions, superstitions, and anecdotes relating to the instrument and its tunesManson, W. L. (William Laird)
History
The Highland bagpipe : $b its history, literature, and music: with some account of the traditions, superstitions, and anecdotes relating to the instrument and its tunes
Manson, W. L. (William Laird)
Bagpipe
(1) _Large Bagpipe._ (2) _Dudey or Hornpipe._ (3) _Shepherd’s Pipe._
(4) _Bagpipe
with Bellows._
]
There was an ancient instrument, called the chorus, which seems to have
been closely related to the bagpipe. The chorus was composed of the skin
of an animal, which was inflated by a pipe in the back of the neck, and
had another pipe issuing from the mouth. That it was not exactly the
same as the bagpipe is evident from the fact that it was called _alterum
genus cori_ to distinguish it from the instrument composed of a bag
specially manufactured with mouth-piece and pipe, which was known as
_unum genus cori_. Giraldus Cambrensis, one of the most authoritative
writers of the twelfth century, assigns the chorus to Scotland, but says
nothing of its construction, although he credits the country with
superior musical skill. Some ancient writers class the chorus with
stringed instruments, and assert that it has no connection whatever with
the bagpipe. Living as we do at the beginning of the twentieth century,
we cannot possibly decide such a delicate point. And it does not matter
much that we cannot.
Those who hold that the instrument was originally imported into Scotland
believe that the parent of the Scottish bagpipe was an instrument known
as the _volynka_, found in some provinces of the Russian Empire and
ascribed more particularly to the Finns, who called it _pilai_. It was a
rude instrument, consisting of two tubes and a mouth-piece, all apart,
inserted in a raw, hairy goatskin. It was not held in high esteem, for
when the Czar degraded the Archbishop of Novogorod in 1569 he alleged
that the worthy father was “fitter for a bagpiper leading dancing bears
than for a prelate.” But no less than five different kinds of bagpipes
were known on the Continent in the seventeenth century, some of them
with very high qualities as musical instruments. They were:—
I. The _cornemuse_, a simple instrument inflated by the mouth, with a
chanter having eight apertures for notes, but without any drones.
II. The _chalemie_, or shepherd’s pipe, used by peasants at festivals,
and also in country churches. It was inflated by the mouth, had a
chanter with ten holes, and had also two drones.
III. The _mussette_, which was inflated by a bellows. It had a chanter
with twelve notes, besides other apertures and valves opened by keys,
and with four reeds for drones, enclosed in a barrel. It was a
complicated instrument, and elaborately made. In one instance, we
read, the bag of the _mussette_ was made of velvet embroidered with
_fleurs de lis_. It was, however, the “class” variety of the bagpipe,
and was played before Royalty. The _mussette_ was said to sound most
sweetly, “especially in the hands of Destouches, the Royal Piper.” So
they had a royal piper in those days and the pipes were honoured.
IV. The _surdelina_ of Naples, an instrument with two drones, two
chanters, and numerous keys.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account