The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
Meanwhile the Peloponnesus itself had become the scene of a fresh
struggle. It has already been mentioned that the exiled aristocrats from
Phlius had been allowed to return at the request of Sparta and had been
promised the restoration of their property. But here, as everywhere, the
attempts at expropriation met with almost insurmountable obstacles. There
may have been a lack of good will to push on the proceedings, since it is
probable that in many cases the judges themselves were in possession of
the estates of the exiles. But in the beginning, at least, there seems to
have been no excessive difficulty or delay in giving compensation, and we
hear that, in the campaign of Agesipolis, the Phliasians distinguished
themselves as zealous allies of Sparta by the liberality and promptitude
of their contributions. After the departure of Agesipolis, as Xenophon
relates, the Phliasians hoping to be quit of Spartan intervention,
neglected the settlement of the chaotic claims. The returning
aristocrats, finding their demands disregarded by an unbiassed court of
arbitration, turned with their grievances to Sparta. The authorities of
their own city having punished them for this arbitrary proceeding, the
ephors, persuaded by exiles and by Agesilaus, the fast friend of the
latter, determined upon a campaign against Phlius. The Phliasians sued
for peace, but naturally could not accede to the demand of Agesilaus for
an unconditional surrender of their citadel.
A tedious siege then began, during which Agesilaus found himself obliged
to have recourse to every kind of artifice to allay the wrath of the
Lacedæmonians and their allies at making enemies of the large population
of the Asopus valley for the sake of a few oligarchs. It was the first
note of that discord among the Peloponnesian allies which was destined to
exercise such a paralysing effect upon the future military undertakings
of the Lacedæmonians. Thanks to the valiant defence of Delphion, to whom
Xenophon does not refuse his due meed of praise, the city held out twice
as long as had been expected. At last, in the year 379, the lack of
provisions constrained the inhabitants to treat for peace, and, unwisely
ignoring Agesilaus, they applied direct to Sparta. Sparta committed the
sole decision to the king, and the punishment in store for Phlius was
naturally not the less severe for the attempt to set Agesilaus aside. A
commission was appointed, consisting of fifty oligarchs and fifty of the
citizens, and they were empowered to decide the question which of the
inhabitants should remain alive and which should not. The further duty of
elaborating a constitution was also assigned to them. To safeguard the
new order of things a Lacedæmonian garrison was left provisionally in the
acropolis. Thus in Phlius, as in Olynthus, Sparta had won the victory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account