The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 04 : $b Greece to the Roman Conquest
World history
In return for such deference he placed his troops at their disposal,
to lead whom they would to prison: and now the catalogue of political
offences was on a sudden terribly enlarged. The persons who were now
singled out for destruction, were no longer such only as had made
themselves odious by their crimes, or had distinguished themselves on
former occasions by their opposition to the ruling party, but men of
unblemished character, without any strong political bias, who had gained
the confidence of the people by their merits or services, and might be
suspected of preferring a popular government to the oligarchy under which
they were living. Xenophon seems to believe that Critias was inflamed
with an insatiable thirst for blood by the remembrance of his exile.
But it would appear that ambition and cupidity, rather than resentment,
were the mainsprings of his conduct, and that he calculated with great
coolness the fruits of his nefarious deeds. Nor was it merely political
jealousy that determined his choice of his victims; the immediate profit
to be derived from the confiscation of their property was at least an
equally powerful inducement. It is uncertain to which of these motives we
should refer the execution of Niceratus, the son of Nicias, who shared
his uncle’s fate, but may have been involved in it more by his wealth
than by his relation to Eucrates. It was perhaps on the like account,
rather than because of the services which he had rendered to the people,
that Antiphon,[1] who during the war had equipped two galleys at his own
expense, was now condemned to death. And it was most probably with no
other object that Leon, an inhabitant of Salamis, who seems to have been
universally respected, and a great number of his townsmen, were dragged
from their homes and consigned to the executioner. The case of Leon is
particularly remarkable for the light it throws on the policy of the
oligarchs. After the arrival of the Lacedæmonian garrison they had begun
to dispense with the assistance of the council; and Leon was put to death
without any form of trial. But they did not think it expedient always to
employ the foreign troops on their murderous errands; they often used
Athenians as their ministers on such occasions, and men who did not
belong to their party, for the purpose of implicating them in the guilt
and odium of their proceedings. When they had resolved on the destruction
of Leon, they sent for Socrates and four other persons, and ordered them
to go and fetch him from Salamis. As his innocence was no less notorious
than the fate which awaited him, Socrates, on leaving the presence of
the Thirty, instead of obeying their commands, returned home. The rest
executed their commission.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account