The Historical Child: Paidology; The Science of the ChildChrisman, Oscar
History
The Historical Child: Paidology; The Science of the Child
Chrisman, Oscar
Children; Manners and customs
A father was to provide a dowry for his daughter conformable to her
station in life, and should the father not be able to do this the
bridegroom would, before marriage, give her sufficient for the necessary
outfit. In case of an orphan the dowry was provided from public funds.
In earlier times, after the giving over of the marriage price and other
gifts, the bridegroom took the bride with him. At a later period a
marriage-feast was given at the bride's home, and at a later period yet
the wedding-feast was furnished at the home of the bridegroom.
Children were very greatly desired by the ancient Hebrews, and
especially male children, as the more children a man had the more was he
respected. Also the expectance of the Messiah, who might come from any
one of the families, made children all the more wished for. Hence
marriage was a duty with them, and this desire for children was also a
cause for polygamy as thereby more children would be born to a family.
Yet polygamy and concubinage was not the rule with the Hebrews but the
rare exception, so far as the people generally were concerned, so that
they really adopted monogamy and were, probably, the only Semites who
did so. Even where polygamy or concubinage did occur the law insisted
that each wife or concubine should receive her full conjugal rights,
which prevented any extended practice even among the most wealthy.
Divorce was allowed for "any shameful thing," which, necessarily, was
interpreted in different ways. "In fact, we know that it included every
kind of impropriety, such as going about with loose hair, spinning in
the street, familiarly talking with men, ill-treating her husband's
parents in his presence, brawling, that is, 'speaking to her husband so
loudly that the neighbors could hear her in the adjoining house,' a
general bad reputation, or the discovery of fraud before marriage. On
the other hand, the wife could insist on being divorced if her husband
were a leper, or effected with polypus, or engaged in a disagreeable or
dirty trade, such as that of a tanner or coppersmith. One of the cases
in which divorce was obligatory was, if either party had become
heretical, or ceased to profess Judaism."[146] Yet divorces were not so
common as might be thought under so loose a statement for procuring
them. Rather strict laws were drawn up explicitly stating for what
divorce could be allowed, both to man and to woman. Divorce was
discouraged and a conciliation was always tried to be brought about
before divorce proceedings began. The divorced parties could marry other
parties and even could unite again. The bill of divorcement had to be
couched in explicit terms, handed to the woman herself, and in the
presence of two witnesses. In separation of the parents where there were
children, the daughters were placed in charge of the mother and the sons
were given to the father; but should the judge consider it of advantage
to the children, the sons also were given to the mother.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account