The Historical Child: Paidology; The Science of the ChildChrisman, Oscar
History
The Historical Child: Paidology; The Science of the Child
Chrisman, Oscar
Children; Manners and customs
=The People.= The ancient Egyptians, although in Africa, were not from
African races but were of Asiatic descent, as the formation of their
skulls, their features, their hair, and their language, show that they
were of a Caucasian race. "The Egyptians appear to have been among the
darkest races with which the Greeks of the early times came into direct
contact.... The hair was usually black and straight. In no case was it
'woolly,' though sometimes it grew in short, crisp curls.... The
forehead was straight, but somewhat low; the nose generally long and
straight, but sometimes slightly aquiline. The lips were over-full; but
the upper lip was short, and the mouth was seldom too wide. The chin was
good, being well-rounded, and neither retreating nor projecting too far.
The most marked and peculiar feature was the eye, which was a long,
narrow slit, like that of the Chinese, but placed horizontally and not
obliquely. An eyebrow, also long and thin, but very distinctly
pencilled, shaded it. The coloring was always dark, the hair, eyebrows,
eyelashes, and beard (if any) being black, or nearly so, and the eyes
black or dark brown.
"In form the Egyptian resembled the modern Arab. He was tall; his limbs
were long and supple; his head was well placed upon his shoulders; his
movements were graceful; his carriage dignified. In general, however,
his frame was too spare; and his hands and feet were unduly large. The
women were as thin as the men, and had forms nearly similar. Children,
however, appear to have been sufficiently plump; but they are not often
represented."[24]
The people were divided into classes and although the separation of the
classes was very marked and distinct, yet there was really no rigid
caste system, as the boundaries were crossed by people ascending from a
lower class into a higher. Of course, as with all people, it was quite
customary for the son to take up the work of his father, but, at least,
in some cases this was not compulsory. In one instance it is shown where
the occupation of architect had descended from father to son for
twenty-one generations. There is difficulty in knowing just what were
the divisions of society but at any rate there were at least three
distinct classes, which were the priestly class, the military class, and
the rest of the people. The first two classes, from whom came the king,
were exempt from taxation. The rest of the people had to bear the burden
of the taxes, to construct the public works, to perform the agricultural
tasks, and to carry on all mechanical and other pursuits. They had a
hard time and yet the laws regarding them seem to have been justly
administered and it would appear as if they were contented with their
condition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account