The Historical Child: Paidology; The Science of the ChildChrisman, Oscar
History
The Historical Child: Paidology; The Science of the Child
Chrisman, Oscar
Children; Manners and customs
"But if women enjoy very little consideration in private life, they are
in some degree compensated by the respect which is paid to them in
public. They do not, it is true, receive those insipid compliments which
we have agreed to consider polite; but then, on the other hand, they are
safe from the risk of insult. A Hindu woman can go anywhere alone, even
in the most crowded places, and she need never fear the impertinent
looks and jokes of idle loungers. This appears to me to be really
remarkable in a country where the moral depravity of the inhabitants is
carried to such lengths. A house inhabited solely by women is a
sanctuary which the most shameless libertine would not dream of
violating. To touch a respectable woman even with the end of your finger
would be considered highly indecorous, and a man who meets a female
acquaintance in the street does not venture to stop and speak to
her."[51]
Courtesans in India, as in Greece, if of great beauty and
accomplishments, were accorded many more privileges than the other
women. As these were used in the temples, they were permitted to learn
to read and to sing and to dance, accomplishments which a respectable
woman would have been ashamed to have acknowledged even if she should
have learned them.
In the early times, during the Vedic period, it would seem that the
girls had some choice in the selection of the husband, and yet the
father must have exercised some control over the affair. But later the
selection of both bride and groom was fast fixed in the hands of the
parents, who arranged everything. With the young man's family the purity
of the caste of the future wife was the greatest concern, beauty and
personal attraction counting nothing, while the girl's parents thought
more of the fortune of the bridegroom to be and of the character of his
mother, because she was to become the absolute mistress of the young
wife. Intermarriage between castes was not strictly forbidden, but a
woman could not marry a man of lower caste without losing caste.
"To a Hindu marriage is the most important and most engrossing event of
his life; it is a subject of endless conversation and of the most
prolonged preparations. An unmarried man is looked upon as having no
social status and as being an almost useless member of society. He is
not consulted on any important subject, and no work of any consequence
may be given to him. A Hindu who becomes a widower finds himself in
almost the same position as a bachelor, and speedily remarries.
"Though marriage is considered the natural state for the generality of
men, those who from pious motives remain unmarried are looked up to and
treated with the utmost respect. But it is only those persons who have
renounced the world, and have chosen to lead a life of contemplation,
who can take vows of celibacy. In any other case marriage is the rule,
and every one is under obligation of discharging _the great debt to his
ancestors_, namely, that of begetting a son.
...
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account