The Historical Child: Paidology; The Science of the ChildChrisman, Oscar
History
The Historical Child: Paidology; The Science of the Child
Chrisman, Oscar
Children; Manners and customs
The laws of China did not sanction polygamy but they did permit
concubinage. The man could have but one wife, who was distinguished by a
proper title, while the concubines were inferior and their children
belonged to the wife. If the wife had borne sons, it was considered
somewhat discreditable for a man to take a concubine, and if he did and
brought her into the same home with his wife there was usually great
disturbance, which accorded with one of their proverbs, That nine women
out of ten are jealous. These concubines were generally purchased with
money and were from the lower classes, where poverty always prevailed,
making occasion for the selling of the girls. In a few cases,
concubinage in a family might have arisen through the wife's desire to
have women and children to serve her, as they would come under her
control.
There were seven grounds for divorce in China, being, barrenness,
adultery, disobedience to the husband's parents, talkativeness,
thievery, ill temper, and malignant disease. But divorce was not for the
wife, for no offense, of whatever kind, on the part of the husband, gave
a woman any right to claim a divorce from him. "Any of these, however,
may be set aside by three circumstances: the wife having mourned for her
husband's parents; the family having acquired wealth since the marriage;
and the wife being without parents to receive her back."[72] The family
of the woman was a great factor against divorce, not only on account of
the unjustness or disgrace attached to it but also because when the
woman married she gave up her home and no provision was made for her
further support and especially so if her parents were dead as the
property was divided among her brothers and she would be looked upon as
an alien. Hence a husband would not be allowed to divorce his wife,
except for a most valid cause.
It was considered disreputable for widows to remarry. But this was not
true of a widower as he could marry whomever he should choose, nor did
he have to wait for any length of time for the ceremony because of any
period of mourning for his first wife. If the widow herself should be
unwilling to marry, the law would protect her against those trying to
make her do so. One of the strong motives against marrying again was
that as long as she remained a widow she would be absolute mistress of
herself and her children. The widow was occasionally sold as a concubine
by her father-in-law, but this was rare, as it was considered a great
degradation and especially as she would be separated from her children.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account