The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
Meanwhile in the northern province things never reached the same
regular organization. ♦York. | Lindisfarn | or Durham, | Carlisle,
1133.♦ York, after some changes, took the position of a metropolitan
see, with one suffragan, first at _Lindisfarn_ and afterwards at
_Durham_, and another at _Carlisle_. ♦Saint Andrews, 1471. | Glasgow.
1492.♦ As the Scottish dioceses broke off from York, they first
acknowledged a kind of precedence in the Bishop of _St. Andrews_; but
it was not till a far later time that Scotland was divided into two
regular ecclesiastical provinces with their sees at _St. Andrews_ and
_Glasgow_. ♦Edinburgh. 1634.♦ Several of the Scottish dioceses always
kept their territorial titles; their sees were mostly fixed in small
places; and of the chief seats of Scottish royalty, Dunfermline and
Stirling never attained episcopal rank at all, and _Edinburgh_ only
attained it in quite modern times. ♦The four Irish provinces.♦ The
endless and fluctuating bishoprics of Ireland were in the twelfth
century gathered into the four provinces of _Armagh_, _Dublin_,
_Cashel_, and _Tuam_, answering to the temporal divisions of _Ulster_,
_Leinster_, _Munster_, and _Connaught_. It is to be noticed that, in
marked contradiction to continental practice, the chief see in all the
three British kingdoms has been placed in a city which has never held
the first temporal rank. Canterbury, St. Andrews, Armagh, were never
the temporal heads of England, Scotland, and Ireland. York, Dublin,
Glasgow, though metropolitan sees, were of secondary rank, and London
and Winchester were ordinary bishoprics.
§ 6. _The Ecclesiastical Divisions of Northern and Eastern Europe._
♦Ecclesiastical division in the converted lands.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account