_Three doorways_, centre, 8 feet 6 inches wide, 8 feet 10 inches high; the two lateral doorways the same height as the centre, and 6 feet 6 inches wide. _Colonnade_, or Second Platform, composed of 230 circular columns, each 12 feet high, and 18 inches in diameter; in two rows; the columns 10 feet apart. _The Single Altar-Column_, 6 feet diameter, and 60 feet high, in centre of area. _Base of First Terrace_, 2560 feet! _Sculptured walls of the Temple_, 40,960 superficial feet! _The Three Artificial Terraces_ contain 72,800 cubic feet! G. J. On the Map of the ruin now under consideration, and directly beneath the "round pillars," is written the following sentence by Stephens himself, to illustrate the meaning of the circular dots on the plan,--the words are, "_Remains of Columns_!" How can he then reconcile from his own descriptions, that "not one Column has been found?" "If," says he, "this Architecture had been derived from the Egyptians, so striking and important a feature [_i. e._ circular Columns] would never have been thrown aside." Well then, the "important feature" has _not_ "been thrown aside," and consequently from his own reasoning, the Architecture was (conjoined with the pyramidal bases) "_derived_ from the Egyptian." We believe distinctly, that the Architecture was "derived from"--in other words--_borrowed_ from,--the edifices of the Nile;--but, not built by the Egyptians themselves. In regard to another branch of Art, he commits himself in the same manner as when writing of Architecture. "Next, as to Sculpture. The idea of resemblance in this particular has been so often and so confidently expressed, that I almost hesitate to declare the total want of similarity." There should indeed be hesitation upon a subject, so capable of denying a conclusion, directly opposed to occular demonstration. "If there be any resemblance [to the Egyptian] at all striking, it is only that the figures, are in _profile_, and this is equally true of all good Sculpture in _bas-relief_."