The History of Antiquity, Vol. 1 (of 6)Duncker, Max
History
The History of Antiquity, Vol. 1 (of 6)
Duncker, Max
History, Ancient
If we compare the works of that epoch, which saw the erection of the
great pyramids, in technical and artistic value with the remains which
have come down from the time of the Amenemha and Sesurtesen--according
to the chronology of Lepsius the two periods are separated by an
interval of six centuries--we find in the great monuments of the first
epoch, in their passages and chambers, a dexterity in the use of stone
for building, which has never been surpassed. The sculptures exhibit
broader and stouter forms, with more strongly-marked but well-shaped
muscles. The ornaments consist of simple, straight lines, besides which
scarcely any other adornment is found beyond the lotus leaf. The style
is composed and full of repose; it remains nearer nature than in the
later works. In the monuments of the time of the Sesurtesen and Amenemha
the ornamentation has already become far richer. The pillars are
massive, fluted, and crowned by a simple cube. The sculptured forms are
taller and thinner; the work in relief, carried out with much industry
and delicacy, displays at times very happy moments of natural grace and
truth of expression, although perspective is entirely left out of
sight. Such work is always carefully painted. The statues of limestone
are also painted throughout; in those of granite, only the clothing, the
eyes and the hair are coloured.[178]
FOOTNOTES:
[130] Diod. 1, 12, 45.
[131] Herod. 2, 99.
[132] Diod. 1, 50. He ascribes the foundation of the city to a later
king, whom he calls Uchoreus.
[133] Strabo, p. 808; Tac. "Ann." 2, 6.
[134] Lepsius asserts that he found traces and remains of sixty-seven
pyramids. "Briefe aus Ægypten," s. 65.
[135] Lepsius, "Abh. der Berl. Akad." 1843, s. 177 ff.
[136] Boeckh, "Metrologie," s. 236.
[137] Herod. 2, 124-127, 134.
[138] Diod. 1, 63, 64.
[139] Brugsch, "Hist. d'Egypte," p. 35.
[140] Cf. Strabo. p. 809.
[141] Lepsius, "Chronologie," s. 248, 302. Gutschmid has supported the
Herodotean inscription on the strength of papyri from the times of
Ramses Miamen in Philologus, 10, 644; the "talents" in any case must be
left for the dragoman.
[142] Lepsius, "Denkmale," 3, 2, plate II.
[143] De Rougé, "Monuments des six premières dynasties; Mémoires de
l'Institut," 1856, 25, 265 ff.
[144] Lepsius, "Denkmale," 3, 2, plate II.
[145] Brugsch, "Hist. d'Egypte," p. 113.
[146] Brugsch, "Zeitschrift für aegyptische Sprache," 1864, s. 61.
[147] De Rougé, _loc. cit._ p. 257.
[148] De Rougé, _loc. cit._ pp. 282, 283.
[149] Herod. 2, 128. M. Büdinger ("Zur ægypt. Forschung Herodot's." s.
24) identifies this Philitis with the shepherd-king Salatis; cf. infra.
[150] Cf. above, p. 59. Mariette, "Revue archéol." 1860, p. 18.
[151] De Rougé, _loc. cit._ pp. 281, 307.
[152] De Rougé, _loc. cit._ p. 267.
[153] De Rougé, _loc. cit._ p. 328 ff.
[154] "Revue archéolog." 1862, p. 279.
[155] Brugsch, _loc. cit._ p. 53.
[156] Rosellini, "Monumenti storici," 3, 33. Brugsch, "Hist. d'Egypte,"
p. 54.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account