The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
Now, in changing phosphoric acid into phosphorus, we may employ almost
any kind of combustible substance that we please, provided it be
capable of bearing the requisite heat; they will all equally answer,
and will all convert the acid into phosphorus. Instead of charcoal we
may take lamp-black, or sugar, or resin, or even several of the metals.
Hence it was concluded that all of these bodies contain a common
principle which they communicate to the phosphoric acid; and since the
new body formed is in all cases identical, the principle communicated
must also be identical. Hence combustible bodies contain an identical
principle, and this principle is phlogiston.
Sulphur by burning is converted into sulphuric acid; and if sulphuric
acid be heated with charcoal, or phosphorus, or even sulphur, it is
again converted into sulphur. Several of the metals produce the same
effect. The reasoning here was the same as with regard to phosphoric
acid, and the conclusion was similar.
When lead is kept nearly at a red heat in the open air for some time,
being constantly stirred to expose new surfaces to the air, it is
converted into the beautiful pigment called _red lead_; this is a calx
of lead. To restore this calx again to the state of metallic lead, we
have only to heat it in contact with almost any combustible matter
whatever. Pit-coal, peat, charcoal, sugar, flour, iron, zinc, &c.,
all these bodies then must contain one common principle, which they
communicate to red lead, and by so doing convert it into lead. This
common principle is phlogiston.
These examples are sufficient to show the reader the way in which
Stahl proved the identity of phlogiston in all combustible bodies. And
the demonstration was considered as so complete that the opinion was
adopted by every chemist without exception.
When we inquire further, and endeavour to learn what qualities
phlogiston was supposed to have in its separate state, we find this
part of the subject very unsatisfactory, and the opinions very
unsettled. Beccher and Stahl represented phlogiston as a dry substance,
or of an earthy nature, the particles of which are exquisitely
subtile, and very much disposed to be agitated and set in motion with
inconceivable velocity. This was called by Stahl _motus verticillaris_.
When the particles of any body are agitated with this kind of motion,
the body exhibits the phenomena of heat or ignition, or inflammation,
according to the violence and rapidity of the motion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account