The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
There is such an analogy between the cessation of thermometric
expansion during the liquefaction of ice, and during the conversion of
water into steam, that there could be no hesitation about explaining
both in the same way. Dr. Black immediately concluded that as water is
ice united to a certain quantity of _latent heat_, so steam is water
united to a still greater quantity. The slow conversion of water into
steam, notwithstanding the great quantity of heat constantly flowing
into it from the fire, left no reasonable doubt about the accuracy of
this conclusion. In short, all the phenomena are precisely similar to
those of the conversion of ice into water; and so, of course, must
the explanation be. So much was he convinced of this, that he taught
the doctrine in his lectures in 1761, before he had made a single
experiment on the subject; and he explained, with great felicity of
argument, many phenomena of nature, which result from this vaporific
combination of heat. From notes taken in his class during this session,
it appears that nothing more was wanting to complete his views on this
subject, than a set of experiments to determine the exact quantity
of heat which was combined in steam in a state not indicated by the
thermometer, and therefore _latent_, in the same sense that the heat of
liquefaction in water is _latent_.
The requisite experiments were first attempted by Dr. Black, in 1764.
They consisted merely in measuring the time requisite to convert a
certain weight of water of a given temperature into steam. The water
was put into a tin-plate wide-mouthed vessel, and laid upon a red-hot
plate of iron, the initial temperature of the water was marked, and the
time necessary to heat it from that point to the boiling point noted,
and then the time requisite to boil the whole to dryness. It was taken
for granted that as much heat would enter into the water during every
minute that the experiment lasted, as did during the first minute. From
this it was concluded that the latent heat of steam is not less than
810 degrees.
Mr. James Watt afterwards repeated these experiments with a better
apparatus and very great care, and calculated from his results that the
latent heat of steam is not under 950 degrees. Lavoisier and Laplace
afterwards made experiments in a different way, and deduced 1000° as
the result of their experiments. The subsequent experiments of Count
Rumford, made in a very ingenious manner, so as to obviate most of the
sources of error, to which such researches are liable, come very nearly
to those of Lavoisier. 1000° therefore, is usually now-a-days adopted
as the number which denotes the true latent heat of steam.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account