The History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
He had already proved that sulphuric acid is a compound of sulphur and
oxygen; and had even shown how the oxygen which the acid contained
might be again separated from it, and exhibited in a separate state.
Dr. Priestley had by this time made known the method of procuring
sulphurous acid gas, by heating a mixture of mercury and sulphuric
acid in a phial. This was the process which Lavoisier analyzed in the
present paper. He put into a retort a mixture of four ounces mercury
and six ounces concentrated sulphuric acid. The beak of the retort was
plunged into a mercurial cistern, to collect the sulphurous acid gas
as it was evolved; and heat being applied to the belly of the retort,
sulphurous acid gas passed over in abundance, and sulphate of mercury
was formed. The process was continued till the whole liquid contents
of the retort had disappeared: then a strong heat was applied to the
salt. In the first place, a quantity of sulphurous acid gas passed
over, and lastly a portion of oxygen gas. The quicksilver was reduced
to the metallic state. Thus he resolved sulphuric acid into sulphurous
acid and oxygen. Hence it followed as a consequence, that sulphurous
acid differs from sulphuric merely by containing a smaller quantity of
oxygen.
The object of his next paper, published at the same time, was to throw
light upon the pyrophorus of Homberg, which was made by kneading
alum into a cake, with flour, or some substance containing abundance
of carbon, and then exposing the mixture to a strong heat in close
vessels, till it ceased to give out smoke. It was known that a
pyrophorus thus formed takes fire of its own accord, and burns when it
comes in contact with common air. It will not be necessary to enter
into a minute analysis of this paper, because, though the experiments
were very carefully made, yet it was impossible, at the time when the
paper was drawn, to elucidate the phenomena of this pyrophorus in a
satisfactory manner. There can be little doubt that the pyrophorus owes
its property of catching fire, when in contact with air or oxygen,
to a little potassium, which has been reduced to the metallic state
by the action of the charcoal and sulphur on the potash in the alum.
This substance taking fire, heat enough is produced to set fire to the
carbon and sulphur which the pyrophorus contains. Lavoisier ascertained
that during its combustion a good deal of carbonic acid was generated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account