The history of drink : $b A review, social, scientific, and politicalSamuelson, James
History
The history of drink : $b A review, social, scientific, and political
Samuelson, James
Drinking of alcoholic beverages -- History; Temperance -- History
Clergymen and priests, _None._
Merchants and brokers, 13
Professional men of all kinds—architects, artists, surgeons, &c., 43
Shopkeepers (including 12 publicans), 194
Clerks and agents, 175
All skilled artisans, including engineers, mechanics, joiners,
masons, printers, &c., 1010
Coachmen, carmen, and carters, 342
Sailors, 894
Porters and dock labourers, 3862
All other occupations, and persons of no occupation, 487
----
7020
Thus it will be seen that, as nearly as possible, two-thirds of the
disorderly drunkenness in the town (for there were the “drunk and
incapables” besides) which ranks second upon the black list (Glasgow
being usually considered the first) is caused by dock-labourers and
sailors, precisely the classes to whom we said we are indebted for our
unenviable reputation as a drunken people! And if the reader turns to
the female statistics for the same year, he will be pained to find
that of 4842 women who were apprehended under the same conditions,
421 are set down as hawkers, which means chiefly basket-women; 1364 as
prostitutes; and 2565 (being nearly all the remainder) as of “no trade.”
What that means we leave the reader to imagine. Of course this statement
embraces the residuum of every class; but, in the author’s opinion, it
presents a fair summary of the relative amount of drunkenness in the
different grades of the middle and lower classes. It has been stated by
some persons who have large opportunities of judging, that drunkenness
is on the increase in England; whilst others as distinctly declare the
reverse. Those who wish to review these opposite expressions of opinion
should read the Report of the Lords’ Committee on Intemperance; but,
in order to show that the evidence there given cannot be considered at
all conclusive on either side, we need only take that of two witnesses.
The Chief Constable of Liverpool (Major Greig) holds the opinion that,
“if anything, he should say that intemperance is increasing” in that
town;[297] but, on the other hand, the Rev. James Nugent, the “Father
Matthew” of Liverpool, who has been twenty-nine years a priest there,
and is now the Roman Catholic chaplain of the borough gaol, says that
“certainly there is less drunkenness in Liverpool” than there was
formerly;[298] and the same uncertainty on the subject seems to prevail
generally throughout the country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account