The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman ConquestHodgkin, Thomas
History
The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman Conquest
Hodgkin, Thomas
Great Britain -- History -- To 1066
The summer of A.D. 79, the second year of Agricola’s command, seems
to have been chiefly occupied in measures for completing the military
occupation of the recently conquered territory, that is, probably,
Yorkshire, Lancashire and Northumberland, the country of the Brigantes.
“He himself chose the site of the camps; he himself reconnoitred the
forests and the estuaries” (probably of the Tees, the Wear and the
Tyne, and perhaps also Solway Firth), “and meanwhile he gave the enemy
no rest, but was for ever harassing them by sudden excursions, and when
he had terrified them sufficiently, then by holding his hand he gave
them an inducement to desire peace. In consequence hereof many native
states which up to that time had treated the empire on a footing of
equality now gave hostages and laid aside their animosity. They found
themselves surrounded with forts and garrisons, and all was done with
so much science and system as had never before been applied to any
newly conquered part of Britain.” It is possible that Eburacum, which
at this time, or very soon after, became the headquarters of the Ninth
legion, was one of the strong places thus founded or fortified by
Agricola.
The record of the year 80, the third year of Agricola’s command, is
one of the most interesting to all north-country Englishmen, but it is
unfortunately also one of the most obscure. It will be well to quote
the words of Tacitus as they stand, without attempting conjectural
amplification. “The third year of expeditions opened up to us new
tribes, all the nations up to the estuary called Tanaus having their
lands laid waste. The enemy cowed by these operations did not dare to
harass the army, though it was buffeted by fierce tempests, and thus
a respite was afforded which was employed in building more forts.
It was observed by military experts that no general ever showed
greater ability in his choice of suitable sites for such defences.
No fort founded by Agricola was ever stormed by hostile violence,
or surrendered, or abandoned by its fugitive garrison: yet frequent
sallies were made from them, for they were fortified against a tedious
siege by a yearly renewed stock of provisions. This gave the defenders
courage for the winter; each garrison relied on itself for its safety,
and the enemy were driven to despair by the uselessness of their
attacks. For aforetime they had been wont to recoup themselves for the
losses of the summer by the successes of winter, but now they found
themselves repelled in both seasons alike.” We have here evidently to
deal with an extensive system of fortification; but we are provoked by
being unable precisely to identify the region in which it took place.
What is the meaning of the estuary called Tanaus “up to which Agricola
ravaged the land”? It is certainly not the Tay (which was indicated
by the corrupt reading Taum); it may be the Firth of Forth; only that
estuary is immediately after called Bodotria. The little Scottish river
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account