The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present time — John Shaqi
The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present timeChallamel, Augustin
History
The history of fashion in France : $b or, the dress of women from the Gallo-Roman period to the present time
Challamel, Augustin
Clothing and dress -- France -- History
Outside political affairs he cared for nothing but the pleasures of the
chase, and locksmith’s work, in which he greatly delighted. He could not
endure that men should wear busks to their pourpoints, nor dress like
Amazons at tournaments; nor would he even tolerate the costly fancy of
sending to Italy or the East for silks, ostrich feathers, perfumes, and
cosmetics.
In the very first year of his reign, on April 22, 1561, he drew up an
edict at Fontainebleau, from which we extract the following passages:—
“We forbid our subjects, whether men, women, or children, to use on their
clothes, whether silken or not, any bands of embroidery, stitching or
pipings of silk, gimp, &c., with which their garments, or part thereof,
might be covered and embellished, excepting only a bordering of velvet
or silk of the width of a finger, or at the utmost two borderings,
chain-stitchings or back-stitchings at the edge of their garments....
“We permit ladies and damsels of birth, who dwell in the country and
outside our towns, to wear gowns and cottes of silk stuff of any colour,
according to their estate and rank, provided always, they shall be
without ornamentation. And as for those who belong to the suite of our
said sister, or other princesses and ladies, they may wear the clothes
they now have, in whatever silk or manner they may be embellished, ...
and only when they are in our suite, and not elsewhere. We allow widows
the use of all silken stuffs, except serge and silk camlet, taffety,
damask, satin, and plain velvet. As to those of birth living in the
country and outside our towns, without any kind of embellishment, nor
other bordering than that which is put to fasten the stitches.... Nor
shall women of whatever sort wear gold on their heads, unless during the
first year of their marriage, &c.”
Such a king as that would, methinks, find much cause for prohibitory
edicts at the present day! What a fidgetty kill-joy! What a despiser of
fine clothes!
Charles IX. issued four edicts on the same subject. On January 17 and 18,
1563, he forbade vertugadins of more than a yard and a half in width,
gold chains, gold work whether with or without enamel, plaques, and all
other buttons for ornamenting head-dresses; and in 1567 he regulated the
dress of all classes, permitting silks only to princesses and duchesses,
prohibiting velvet, and allowing bourgeoises to wear pearls and gold in
their rosaries and bracelets only. The above edicts are to be found in
great awkward folio volumes, amid dry judicial regulations. They form
part of a mass of materials for the historian of the manners and customs
of France.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account