The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Henry’s love of learning, his knowledge of theology, his piety,
are still more praised. Were it not for the little saving-clause
concerning his jealousy of the King of France, and one or two youthful
indiscretions, one might ask in vain for a sign of human frailty. He
heard three Masses a day, when he hunted, and on other days, often four
or five. He followed Vespers and Compline every day in the queen’s
closet. Of the regularity with which he despatched business we have
still proofs, in the papers belonging to this period in the Record
Office.
But _corruptio optimi pessima_, and Wolsey is mainly responsible for
his degeneration, by exercising an almost boundless influence over
the King, to flatter his already inordinate vanity. The Venetians
were meanwhile so much dazzled by Henry’s brilliant qualities, that
they had little admiration left for the Queen. Sagudino dismisses her
with the disparaging remark, “she is rather ugly than otherwise,” and
the ambassador himself says, “she is not handsome, but has a very
beautiful complexion, is very religious, and as virtuous as words
can express”.[8] Gerard de Pleine, in a letter to Margaret of Savoy,
describes her as of a lively and gracious disposition, quite the
opposite of her sister, Joan of Arragon.[9] Her music and dancing were
admired, and it was said that she read, wrote and composed in English
much better and more correctly than half the ladies of her court. To
this Erasmus adds his testimony and says, “Katharine is not only a
miracle of learning, but is not less pious than learned”.[10] She was a
tertiary of St. Francis, and wore a religious habit under her ordinary
dress. Lord Herbert of Cherbury remarks on her virtue and sweet
disposition.[11] But to appreciate qualities such as the Queen’s needed
more than the rather superficial discernment of Giustinian and his
companions, who were so much struck with the pomp and glitter of the
English court, that its real worth almost escaped their notice. Erasmus
declared that in its serious aspects, it was “more like a museum than a
court”.
During the first years of their marriage, the King and Queen had
lived together in almost perfect happiness. Katharine was Henry’s
chosen adviser, the confidante of his state secrets, and the principal
negotiatrix between England and Spain.[12] We have Henry’s own words to
prove that the union was not a mere political one. In a letter written
in the highest spirits to Ferdinand of Arragon, the King declared
that his love for his wife was such that, if he were still free, he
would choose her again in preference to all others.[13] Of Katharine’s
wifely devotion to Henry there has never been any doubt. She adored
him, and thought him a paragon of perfection. But the birth of her
daughter threw Katharine henceforth into the shade, and Wolsey, by his
consummate state-craft, rapidly gained an ascendency over the King.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account