The History of Modern Painting, Volume 3 (of 4): Revised edition continued by the author to the end of the XIX centuryMuther, Richard
History
The History of Modern Painting, Volume 3 (of 4): Revised edition continued by the author to the end of the XIX century
Muther, Richard
Painting -- History
So long as any advance beyond Rousseau and Corot seemed impossible,
pictures of talent but only moderate importance had increased in number
in the province of landscape. The landscape painters who immediately
followed the great pioneers loved nature on account of her comparative
coolness in summer; upon sites where the classic artists of
Fontainebleau dreamed and painted they built comfortable villas and
settled down with the sentiments of a householder. The country was
parcelled out, and each one undertook his part, and painted it
conscientiously without arousing any novel sensations. Impressionism
gave landscape painting, which showed signs of being split into
specialties, once more a firm basis, a charming field of study. To
communicate impressions without any of the studio combinations, just as
they strike us suddenly, to preserve the vividness and cogency of the
first imprint of nature upon the mind, was the great problem which
Impressionism placed before the landscape painters. The artists of
Fontainebleau painted neither the rawness and rigidity of winter nor the
sultry atmosphere and scorching heat of summer; they painted artistic
and dignified and exquisite works. The Impressionists did not approach
their themes as poets, but as naturalists. In their hands landscape,
which in Corot, Millet, Diaz, Rousseau, Daubigny, and Jongkind is an
occasional poem, becomes a likeness of a region under special influences
of light. With more delicate nerves, and a sensibility almost greater,
they allowed nature to work upon them, and perceived in the symphonies
of every hour strains never heard before, transparent shadows, the
vibration of atoms of light. decomposing the lines of contour, that
tremor of the atmosphere which is the breath of landscape. Here also
England was not without influence. As Corot and Rousseau received an
impulse from Constable and Bonington in 1830, Monet and Sisley returned
from London with their eyes dazzled by the light of the great Turner.
Laid hold upon, like Turner, by the miracles of the universe, by the
golden haze which trembles in a sunbeam, they succeeded in painting
light in spite of the defectiveness of our chemical mediums.
[Illustration: MONET. THE CHURCH AT VARANGÉVILLE.
(_By permission of M. Durand-Ruel, the owner of the copyright._)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account