The History of Napoleon BuonaparteLockhart, J. G. (John Gibson)
History
The History of Napoleon Buonaparte
Lockhart, J. G. (John Gibson)
France -- Kings and rulers -- Biography; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821
Meantime, while all the princes of Europe regarded with indignation
(though few of them, indeed, cared to express the feeling openly) the
cruel tragedies which had been acted in France, the death of Pichegru
had suppressed effectually the hopes of the royalists in that country,
and the exile of Moreau deprived the republicans of the only leader
under whom there was any likelihood of their taking arms against the
Chief Consul. He resolved to profit by the favourable moment for
completing a purpose which he had long meditated; and, on the 30th of
April, little more than a month after the Duke d'Enghien died, one
Curée was employed to move, in the Tribunate, "that it was time to bid
adieu to political illusions--that victory had brought back
tranquillity--the finances of the country had been restored, and the
laws renovated--and that it was a matter of duty to secure those
blessings to the nation in future, by rendering the supreme power
hereditary in the person and family of Napoleon."--"Such," he said, "was
the universal desire of the army and of the people. The title of
Emperor, in his opinion, was that by which Napoleon should be hailed, as
best corresponding to the dignity of the nation."
This motion was carried in the Tribunate, with one dissenting voice,
that of Carnot; who, in a speech of great eloquence, resisted the
principle of hereditary monarchy altogether. He admitted the merits in
war and in policy of the Chief Consul--he was at present the Dictator of
the Republic, and, as such, had saved it.--"Fabius, Camillus,
Cincinnatus were dictators also. Why should not Buonaparte, like them,
lay down despotic power, after the holding of it had ceased to be
necessary to the general good? Let the services of a citizen be what
they might, was there to be no limit to the gratitude of the nation? But
at all events, even granting that Buonaparte himself could not be too
highly rewarded, or too largely trusted, why commit the fortunes of
posterity to chance? Why forget that Vespasian was the father of
Domitian, Germanicus of Caligula, Marcus Aurelius of Commodus?" In
effect Carnot, colleague as he had been of Robespierre, and stained as
he was with the blood of Louis XVI., was a sincere republican; and,
after his own fashion, a sincere patriot. He was alone in the
Tribunate--the rest of whose members prolonged, during three whole days,
a series of fulsome harangues, every one of which terminated in the same
implicit agreement to the proposal of Curée.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account