The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4) — John Shaqi
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
Meantime the Congress of the thirteen United Colonies had been in
session at Philadelphia, resolving itself into a committee of the
whole, from day to day, to consider “the state of trade in the
colonies.” Patriots by the thousand had answered the cries of distress
at Lexington by gathering with their muskets about Boston. The battle
of Bunker Hill, the most glorious defeat recorded in the annals of
American warfare, had been fought and lost, because the supplies of
gunpowder, brought by the colonists in the old-fashioned cowhorns, had
failed them. Of missiles there was apparently no lack--they would have
used pebbles from the beach had no others been available and powder
abundant. But the want of gunpowder became chronic, and in considering
the state of trade in the colonies the Congress found that of all
branches of that trade the one needing their most careful attention
was the trade in gunpowder. It was a trade that did not thrive under
the circumstances; but there was one source of supply that did not
escape the attention of such able-minded as well as able-bodied
citizens as Capt. Jeremiah O’Brien and his ilk afloat. That source was
in the supply ships that provided for the British forces, and in the
smaller cruisers that waited on the great ships of the British fleet.
The sailormen of the coast pointed to the supplies afloat, and the
legislators adopted the views of the sailormen. Massachusetts, Rhode
Island, and Connecticut provided small cruisers on their own account
and sent them out seeking the enemy’s supply ships, which, because the
rebellious colonies had theretofore no sort of a navy, came to Boston
and other ports in the king’s possession, unarmed and without convoy.
The far-sighted Washington, who had been placed in command of the
heterogeneous forces about Boston, took hold of this matter and brought
it to the attention of the Congress. In the mind of Washington it was
an expedient well worth trying, but apparently he regarded it only as a
temporary expedient. For during the summer and early fall of 1775, when
the need of gunpowder became and remained most urgent, the colonies
were fighting only for their rights as British subjects, as the reader
remembers, and not for national independence. A few long-headed
leaders undoubtedly saw the drift of current events, but with every
address to the throne there was sent a protestation of loyalty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account