The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
The career of Commodore Esek Hopkins as commander-in-chief of the
American navy lasted for a year and ten days. If it was not a glorious
career it was at least an instructive one, and the candid student is
likely to conclude that, under the circumstances, it was creditable
to his reputation. He was badly handicapped from the beginning in a
variety of ways, but in spite of this he accomplished something.
As already noted, Commodore Hopkins received his appointment chiefly
through the influence of John Adams, and because he was the brother of
the capable Governor of Rhode Island. The student of American history
should keep in mind that the colonists were still monarchists in 1775,
and that they followed the monarchial system of appointing favorites
to office. That is to say, the man who had the most influence, who
had what politicians call a “pull,” got the appointment, regardless,
usually, of his fitness for the place. Commodore Hopkins had been a
brigadier-general in the Rhode Island militia by appointment of his
brother. He had served in various capacities at sea, but it is likely
that training had made him a soldier rather than a sailor, and no
greater mistake can be made by executive authority than to appoint a
soldier to do a sailorman’s work.
Further than this, the vessels under the command of Hopkins were all
built for carrying cargoes and not for fighting--they were not as swift
or as handy as fighting ships of the same size. Worse yet, they were
manned by crews brought together for the first time--men who were not
only unacquainted with each other, and therefore devoid of _esprit de
corps_, but who were unaccustomed, for the most part, to the discipline
necessary on a man-of-war and untrained in the use of great guns. When
compared with the crews of the British warships they were more inferior
in these two respects than were the raw militia around Boston when
compared with the British regulars. The raw militia could at least
shoot well.
[Illustration: A Letter from Esek Hopkins.
_From the original at the Lenox Library._]
With these facts in mind it is worth while comparing the American
ships with the British naval forces on the coast. As said, Commodore
Hopkins had eight vessels, of which two only were ships, and the others
were brigs or smaller, and all were lubberly merchantmen. All told,
this squadron mounted just 114 guns, of which the largest was a cannon
that could throw a round cast-iron ball weighing nine pounds. Even of
these there were less than fifty. And the powder to load them and the
muskets with which the seamen had been armed were all borrowed from the
commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account