The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
But we can determine the relative efficiency of the two crews much
more readily by an examination of the hulls of the flagships. Keeping
in mind that the two leading British ships had as great a weight of
metal in long guns as the whole Yankee squadron, gun-boats and all,
and that these two British ships were relentlessly firing at the
American flagship during almost the entire time of the battle, a
counting of the round-shot holes in the two flagships gives a measure
of British and American marksmanship, which, though less to the
credit of the Americans than in some other battles, is unmistakable.
The _Saratoga_ was struck by fifty-five round shot; the British
_Confiance_ by one hundred and five. And yet it was point-blank range,
for long guns, over water that lay dead, while the first broadside
from the _Confiance_ was accurate. When the Yankees came to examine
into this matter they learned how they had escaped. Having set their
guns at the right range for the first broadside the British did not
thereafter trouble themselves to look after the range. They loaded
and fired “with fury”--with a whoop and a huzza! But each discharge
pinched the wedge-shaped quoin a trifle from under the breech of their
guns--lowered the breech and elevated the muzzle--so that very soon
their shots were flying high over the Yankee hull. But the cooler
Yankee gunners kept the quoins in place and the range good. Worse yet,
on examining the British guns some were found with shot under the
powder instead of on top, and some with wads at the bottom of the bore
and some crammed to the muzzle--the veritable method of the tenderfoot
on a runway, but not at all what is expected of an experienced naval
tar. And yet the _Confiance_ was manned by picked seamen.
When the fight was over Macdonough wrote the following letter to
Secretary of the Navy William Jones:
“The Almighty has been pleased to grant us a signal victory on Lake
Champlain, in the capture of one frigate, one brig, and two sloops of
war of the enemy.”
This letter and his prayer on the quarter-deck have been often used in
religious discourses--and very properly so. But for the sake of the
honor of the flag, and with no desire whatever to lessen the reader’s
reverence for sacred matters, one who has lived with sailors in both
ends of the ship is impelled to declare that, for the purpose of
rousing seamen to do their best when going into battle, one rooster in
the rigging is worth a dozen prayers on the quarter-deck.
Because the Battle of Lake Champlain and that on Lake Erie were the
only squadron battles of this war, it is worth while comparing the
disposition of the forces made by the two youthful commanders who won.
Both Perry and Macdonough were very young for such responsible posts
as they held--Perry was twenty-seven, and Macdonough was twenty-eight.
Neither had ever had an independent command in battle before being
called on to handle a squadron against an experienced enemy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account