The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
On Lake Erie Perry had the moral advantage, such as it was, of making
the attack; he had also the physical advantage of a somewhat superior
force. But these advantages were more than neutralized by the advantage
which the enemy held in being able to concentrate his force to receive
the attack and by the very light wind, which was still further deadened
by the concussion of great guns after firing began. The lack of wind
kept a great part of Perry’s fleet so far in the rear that the flagship
near the head of the line had to stand the brunt of the battle--the
concentrated fire of about all of the enemy’s squadron. Perry was
also handicapped by the unexplained failure of Elliott to close in
on the enemy. Commander Ward, in his “Naval Tactics,” written for the
instruction of naval cadets, speaks of Perry’s oblique attack as “that
which gallantry counselled rather than the more circuitous, perhaps
more prudent, course” which would have taken Perry’s ship abreast of
the British before running within gunshot. But when through gallantry
he had lost his ship, practically, “and a less determined officer might
have despaired of the day,” he “quit his own disabled ship for another”
and “with consummate judgment and celerity, reformed the van of his
squadron, composed of the heaviest ships, and not only retrieved his
loss, but in a few minutes secured victory.” “This combination was most
masterly,” says Ward, referring to what may be called Perry’s renewed
attack. It was his gallantry combined with his splendid judgment and
celerity of action that gave Perry enduring fame. The Battle of Lake
Erie appealed to the sentiment as well as to the cold judgment of
Perry’s countrymen, whether afloat or ashore, and now that more than
eighty years have passed, his handling of the squadron, taking the
battle as a whole, meets as hearty approval from naval officers as it
did in the fall of 1813.
Quite different were the conditions, under which Macdonough had to
fight. The force of the enemy was superior, and he rightly chose
to receive rather than make the attack. As Barclay, the British
commander on Lake Erie, concentrated his power as much as possible,
so did Macdonough when awaiting the enemy. His choice of positions in
Plattsburg Bay far outweighed the moral advantage which the British
had in making an attack. And the rare judgment which Macdonough showed
in preparing for the emergencies of battle far outweighed in the end
the superior force--the very greatly superior force which the British
possessed in the concentration of their long guns on a frigate and a
brig.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account